SanDyk Posted:

Technically according to the nudist bumociation they aren’t “porn” because there is nothing sexual about the nudity. If there is it’s probably unintentional. That’s why having naked children on a nudist site is in a gray area. I’m not sure if the pictures were actually pictures on that site or it was from another nudist site that it linked to however my point was that things like that shouldn’t really be overlooked especially when pictures of naked children involved.

THERE’S NOT EVEN NUDITY!

Seriously. You don’t want to get banned for posting a link specifically to the “child porn” you claim exists there… so report it. Or tubmail me. I went back through the website about half an hour ago and clicked on every link I could find. There are NO images of naked people at any age.

edit: or for the love of god, you’re idling in an IRC channel with me… send me the link there. that’s completely not fwz touchable.