MODERATOR
|
|
100
|
Level 69 Troll
Good poster, upvoted. Also loves juicy balls (no homo).
|
|
man-man Posted:
Ok. This right here, this puts me on his side.
I wouldn’t normally care about ‘mod discretion’ being exercised, because the alternative is a morbum of carefully worded rules that try in vain to eliminate every loophole. Human judgement is a good patch-over so that people who need banning can get banned. But this just seems vindictive; you were holding a grudge, waiting for any shallow pretext to ban the guy, and now you’ve decided the opportunity was there.
Maybe you’re ****ed off with this thread, maybe you find him annoying, maybe you’re blind drunk or have a hangover or someone killed your cat/****ed in your cereal this morning… whatever. None of that is a reason for a ban, no matter how much discretion you’re allowed.
****ing shameful moderation when someone can raise a complaint, however trivial or otherwise it may be, and have that be taken as trolling the person complained against.
Good post, upvoted.
GO GO GADGET RON PAUL
Log in to see images!
|