Check out our blog!
Forumwarz is the first "Massively Single-Player" online RPG completely built around Internet culture.

You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.

You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.

Log in or Learn about Forumwarz

Civil Discussion
Switch to Role-Playing Civil Discussion

Viewing a Post

zagerblag

Avatar: 102042 Wed Jun 03 22:55:29 -0400 2009
16

[Board of Directors]

Level 35 Hacker

asdf

Grayson81 Posted:

If you’re going to post something that condescending, you should probably check your facts first. The game’s creators have already said that they have intentionally modified the rules of Blackjack because they wanted to move the odds in favour of Gamblebot.

It has been speculated (by people who have every bit as much of an idea about how randomness works as you do) that this has been done by changing the odds of Gamblebot’s second card being the most useful one.

As a keen gambler, I’m offended by this concept. If they want to modify the payout, they should do so by changing the reward for winning, not by moving away from the the fact that Blackjack is meant to be played with a deck of 52 normal playing cards (each of which has the same chance of appearing).

Really? That would suck, and it would completely ruin any attempt at formulating a decent GambleBot Blackjack strategy. Where was this? I actually want to do this test now; unfortunately, I can’t script. Are you sure they weren’t referring to the 1.2x payout for Blackjacks?

Internet Delay Chat
Have fun playing!
To chat with other players, you must Join Forumwarz or Log In now!