Deific Blunder Posted:

Again, ETYMOLOGY is not what he was going for. He was using a standard definition of the word, not using it in it’s historical sense. Of course, like the typical internet juggernaut you are, you resort to ad hominem when your terrible point gets shut down by basic sources.

I was joking with King because I knew he would understand wtf I am talking about. I have no idea where the **** you came from or who you are. You have succeeded in blowing up some random shenanigans into OMG SRS BIZ. I agree with you except for the part about ad hominem, anyone who cites an online ‘resource’ like dictionary.com deserves to be mocked for the stupid fabulous person that they are. You call that kind of **** a basic source? I waged next you’ll be citing drudgereport.com for your next round of witty banter.

In any case I’m going to bed. The room is spinning and I have to be up in 5 hours.

Enjoy The Sound Of Silence.