Drunkenlazybastard Posted:

Or you could actually read some scholarly peer reviewed articles on the topic written by people who actually know wtf they are talking about and try that on for size.

PROTIP: wikipedia and online dictionaries are for braindead fabulous persons like yourself JSTOR: = win and awesome if you want some **** that isn’t written by armchair history /k/ommandos.

Again, ETYMOLOGY is not what he was going for. He was using a standard definition of the word, not using it in it’s historical sense. Of course, like the typical internet juggernaut you are, you resort to ad hominem when your terrible point gets shut down by basic sources.