You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.
|How to get some moneyz & scoopz~ By Shynrix|
My name is Shynrix and I have a tip4u
I wrestled with not telling you guys this for days, literally. I thought~ But then everyone will have these antifreeze scoops, Ill never win medals, everything will cost more cause everyone will have more money. But eventually I decided, more people will be happy!
And so, from reading over some of the other blackjack threads, some people think he cheats, some people say streaky or w/e
What Im going to tellz you, has never failed me, if done RIGHT~
first, heres the picture/guide
Idk if this is the best way, but i found it, and it works for me
now~ teh trick
and btw, it doesnt seem to work fantastically except on this site, other blackjack games, not so much
Bet 5000, if win, play 5000 again, if lose, play 10000
If Bet 10000, and win, play 5000, if lose, play 25000
Either way win or lose at 25000, you play 5000 after
DO NOT BREAK RULE OF STEP 3
Early on in the theorizing days I use to do this, id be like~ oh well~ theres not much chance ill lose 4 times in a row, and ill recoop some of my losses
but one time i did this 3x and said F it, im going to keep going @ 25k til i break even
I played like 75 more hands and didnt.
Just follow the plan, its been over a week going now for me and everyday im up at least 75k, usually 100k, today 200k (but i was a bit lucky with a couple double downs~) as long as I play to 10 scoops.
I’m not going to guarantee this or anything~ but its been more than 7 straight days, I’m pretty certain it works~
|Posted On: 12/27/2009 12:04PM||View Shynrix's Profile | #|
gamblebot has been spaded to death, there’s a script that does it all for you, and gambling loses you money in the long run
|Posted On: 12/27/2009 2:28PM||View TUBSWEETIE's Profile | #|
This method is really old in Black Jack, but in order to work, you had to have (theorally) an infinite amount of money. Of course, nobody has that amount of money, so in the end, you can easily lose ALL your money.
It’s mathematically not profitable.
|Posted On: 12/27/2009 2:53PM||View Nikolos's Profile | #|
Plus, your card is optimized for a different set of parameters than GambleBot uses. GambleBot uses a single deck, reshuffling between every deal, and doesn’t allow for split or surrender.
|Posted On: 12/27/2009 3:35PM||View MC Banhammer's Profile | #|
good work posting like a ****ing retard though, it helps sell your awful idea.
Mod Edit: Just for the record, user was banned for a post in another thread. This one tacked onto his time. Just so you all can’t accuse me of not taking care of this while taking care of other posts in the thread.
|Posted On: 12/27/2009 10:17PM||View Indiana Jonas's Profile | #|
“gamblebot has been spaded to death, there’s a script that does it all for you, and gambling loses you money in the long run”
Mayhaps I shared this idea differently than it is being understood~
I’m not saying it’s a superior plan for normal casino everyday every site ever EVER blackjack. Im saying it works here, and having tested it elsewhere, and finding out it DOESNT work (usually) I am led to believe mayhaps its not luck or superior strategy, but some strange way it works with gamblebot.
Call it a bug instead of a strategy, and one worth trying, since it is working quite well for me.
“This method is really old in Black Jack, but in order to work, you had to have (theorally) an infinite amount of money. Of course, nobody has that amount of money, so in the end, you can easily lose ALL your money.”
Yea if you’re a fabulous person that didn’t read all the way. You don’t double ALWAYS, you stop at 25,000. Sometimes that means you lose 40,000 flezz, but that is seldom. I do not believe you can lose ALL your money playing this way, with this guide. Well if you did that means you’d take your something close to 49% chance to win @ blackjack, and lose every 10,000 & 25,000 hand for a long time to NOT get your 10 scoops first…or have little money. I started this idea with 200,000 flezz and i went broke once, but that was not following rule 3, and continuing with 25,000.
It may not be mathematically profitable, but its triedLog in to see images!sted profitable for me. Try it for yourself, You really wont lose that much even if I’m terribly wrong.
“Plus, your card is optimized for a different set of parameters than GambleBot uses. GambleBot uses a single deck, reshuffling between every deal, and doesn’t allow for split or surrender.”
I concur with this bumessment, the split & surrender thing. BUT IT STILL WORKS~ just follow the rules as if you couldnt split, you have two eights? well play like you have 16. It is not rocket science.
“good work posting like a ****ing retard though, it helps sell your awful idea.”
It doesn’t gain me any money, so I guess I don’t want to sell it to any fabulous persons, just people who are struggling not losing money on the scoops everyday and are willing to try anything. I am somewhat certain no one in this thread is one of them. True story~
|Posted On: 12/27/2009 10:38PM||View Shynrix's Profile | #|
Stop ****ing posting.
Also don’t call people fabulous persons in CD this is carebearland where you have to be nice. I’ll let you off with a warning this time don’t let it happen again you tremendous piece of ****.
|Posted On: 12/27/2009 10:42PM||View Indiana Jonas's Profile | #|
He’s only being called a fabulous person if he didn’t read all the way, fabulous person.
Mod Edit: User warned – not banned despite the big red message.
Shynrix was banned for this post by spacekadt
|Posted On: 12/27/2009 10:43PM||View Shynrix's Profile | #|
|Posted On: 12/27/2009 10:44PM||View Indiana Jonas's Profile | #|
Damn, man. That was mean.
|Posted On: 12/27/2009 10:55PM||View Joseph of Suburb...'s Profile | #|
Can I get a tier-by-tier depiction of insults here~
In my history I know of no place where fabulous person is > tremendous piece of ****~
|Posted On: 12/27/2009 10:56PM||View Shynrix's Profile | #|
Hobart Bliggity Posted:
Shii edited this message on 12/27/2009 11:08PM
|Posted On: 12/27/2009 11:07PM||View Shii's Profile | #|
That list is void
it doesn’t have retard
|Posted On: 12/27/2009 11:11PM||View Shynrix's Profile | #|
I do say! I believe wanker deserves a higher place of rank! My comrades find the insult QUITE offensive!
|Posted On: 12/27/2009 11:14PM||View Sir William H Ve...'s Profile | #|