this makes no sense to me, some of these arguments..destroy 10 scoops in they have 4 or less? what the hell is the use in that?. as to op, i agree, 10 scoops was better, 6 isnt powerful enough at all, especially vs raiders

-oic,@4..i was thinking of it in reverse..-still not good enough imo

Signed, I also want the destroyer medal out there. I mean it just makes sense and creates a far more competitive dom, especially if other players can see who’s causing the most damage.

I wish there was some way to keep track of who causes ties, and medal that, because if that was true I’d have three more medals. and I got screen pics for proof.

Make another card called bumhole Ultra ™ that destroys 50 scoops but it costs more than 4 scoops (something like 20 scoops)

I’m sorry, what is your point? Every medal is number of scoops you get and card planning plus card luck.

If anything a destruction medal would be the least earned “accidental” medal. There are medals every single week that happen in brackets where absolutely no one is playing. Some random person takes max and fav flava because they used their visits – there was zero game play. It would be impossible for a person to just sit there doing nothing and get a destruction based medal. They would have to actively choose to purchase cards.

Also, it would be far from safest as a medal. You can know what you’ve done in a week, but it would be pretty impossible to judge what other players have done.