You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.
You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.
![]() |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
As forumbuildr scores of the elite kiddos are rising, the amount of submissions they can put in completely dwarfs that of a new player: right now there’s a 40 vs. 7 difference, and it will likely only increase in the future. Pretty off-putting to new players: to compete they’ll probably need to raise their scores for months before they have a chance to get the most submissions in for enemies, thread titles or typical posts.
My suggestion would be to put up a more attainable cap on submissions, just like we have a level cap that is relatively low. The exact number is largely immaterial and I’m no FB expert but I’ll toss up a figure of say 20? That takes a score of 13, which is really enough proof that one is able to put in reasonably successful submissions.
Mind you, I’m NOT talking about a limit on FB SCORE. That would still remain, only it would only be cosmetic after you reach the cap, much like excess cred. So we would still have the leaderboard functioning exactly as it does now.
Discuss. |
||||||
Posted On: 07/29/2008 4:15PM | DEAD fabulous person | # | ||||||
|
bump DEAD FAGGOT edited this message on 07/29/2008 6:02PM |
||||||
Posted On: 07/29/2008 5:53PM | DEAD fabulous person | # | ||||||
|
thats less fun. otherwise i have no opinion on it one way or another. Pickled Dickbutt edited this message on 07/29/2008 5:54PM |
||||||
Posted On: 07/29/2008 5:54PM | Pickled male reproductive organbum... | # | ||||||
|
sure |
||||||
Posted On: 07/29/2008 5:58PM | View Tesfan's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Pickled male reproductive organbum Posted:
You don’t even use all your submissions, right? Do you think anyone would be seriously handicapped by having their subs limited to 20? Do you think it’s a good idea to just let scores rise and do nothing until new players are facing chances of 100 vs. 7? 200? Seriously, I can’t think of a good reason NOT to have some limit on it.
|
||||||
Posted On: 07/29/2008 5:58PM | DEAD fabulous person | # | ||||||
|
i think a cap of around 25 would be fine. 40 is certainly way too much to actually use. |
||||||
Posted On: 07/29/2008 5:59PM | Pickled male reproductive organbum... | # | ||||||
Don’t be stupid. Put the cap to 10. |
|||||||
Posted On: 07/30/2008 2:45AM | View Travalgar's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Travalgar Posted:
10 Submissions? That’s rather low and makes FB score almost nonfunctional.
|
||||||
Posted On: 07/30/2008 2:54AM | DEAD fabulous person | # | ||||||
|
for once we agree |
||||||
Posted On: 07/30/2008 2:56AM | View Velveteen's Profile | # | ||||||
SG94 Posted:
I meant +10 FB score. |
|||||||
Posted On: 07/30/2008 3:20AM | View Travalgar's Profile | # | ||||||
|
so 17 subs. |
||||||
Posted On: 07/30/2008 3:31AM | Pickled male reproductive organbum... | # | ||||||
Bump in light of domination imbalance. |
|||||||
Posted On: 08/19/2008 10:49AM | View SG94's Profile | # | ||||||
|
How has the change affected how much chocolate can be earned? Previously downvotes more or less balanced upvotes from what I was seeing, so does that mean players are now earning lots of chocolate, where before it was practically none? |
||||||
Posted On: 08/19/2008 11:04AM | View meeeeeeeeee's Profile | # | ||||||
|
in light of domination balance, I am now against this. a high number of submissions gives solo players the ability to rake in a lot of scoops. sort of like a chocolate raid. Which in turn encourages a lot of participation in forumbuildr, Which results in better forums.
one’s access to the windfalls is determined purely on the quality of their submissions. |
||||||
Posted On: 08/19/2008 11:04AM | Pickled male reproductive organbum... | # | ||||||
|
Instead of a hard cap, I suggest merely changing the formula so that the rate at which you get more submissions decays. Something like 5 + score ^ .5 or 10 + ln(score)
Granted I don’t even know what the current formula is so for all I know it might already work that way. 1338h4x edited this message on 08/19/2008 11:11AM |
||||||
Posted On: 08/19/2008 11:11AM | View 1338h4x's Profile | # | ||||||
|
it is currently simply buildrscore + 7, and your buildrscore can either get +1, +2, no change, or -1 based on the sum of all your submissions relative the the average sum, at the end of any given week. one week I had a total of -15 and still got +1, so the end score adjustments are heavily biased by how people are voting during the week. |
||||||
Posted On: 08/19/2008 11:14AM | Pickled male reproductive organbum... | # | ||||||
Pickled male reproductive organbum Posted:
That would be true if everyone had the same number of subs available and wouldn’t be dwarfed by players with insane scores. |
|||||||
Posted On: 08/19/2008 11:17AM | View SG94's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Pickled male reproductive organbum Posted: You already have a huge number of submissions, which if you stay active, is an unbumailable advantage. And from now on, you’re going to be using all your submissions I guess, which means newer players aren’t going to get a look in at any of the peens either.
Encouraging creativity is good, but the current advantage, for constant participation is effectively exponential (up to the point where we’re flooded with submissions I guess, not that that’s a bad thing in itself) Squidly edited this message on 08/19/2008 11:18AM |
||||||
Posted On: 08/19/2008 11:17AM | View Squidly's Profile | # | ||||||
|
its not difficult to get a pretty high buildrscore if you are patient. on an alt I already have a score of 10 after only a few weeks of subbing.
to get the peens you just have to get your buildrscore high enough, then go “all in” in any given category.
chances are those like me who are using all our subs are gonna spread them out or use them in the highly voted categories of enemies and ideas. (if we’re clever enough anyway)
you gotta look past the present situation at the bigger picture. |
||||||
Posted On: 08/19/2008 11:20AM | Pickled male reproductive organbum... | # | ||||||
|
I appreciate the advantages to the bigger picture, and that we’ll hopefully be getting much higher quality forums because of this change, but it’s not without a price. 40 submissions vs 7 (starting this week) is a huge advantage. In 6 months someone starting now might be on 40 submissions, and you’d then be on… 70? And in each category we’d have a few thousand entries to vote in… |
||||||
Posted On: 08/19/2008 11:25AM | View Squidly's Profile | # | ||||||