You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.
You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.
doug05257's Flamebate Posts
View doug05257's Profile
Search Results | ||
---|---|---|
![]() |
Vanilla Re-evaluation?Lol. No joke – I was looking at my avatar on this thread and pondered paying for it to be changed. Went to the character page and.. it was changed! Thanks, this avatar more accurately depicts one that a Troll would use. (view post) |
03/11/2008 |
![]() |
Vanilla Re-evaluation?You’ve mailed me…. what now? Your STDs? :S (view post) |
03/11/2008 |
![]() |
Vanilla Re-evaluation?Lust Posted: |
03/11/2008 |
![]() |
Vanilla Re-evaluation?Fiction Posted:
First of all, there’s no one in my bracket from my Klan. Secondly, I doubt more than two or three people from my Klan still play, making me essentially a solo player. Thirdly, you ARE in my bracket, and since you’re recieving all of these lovely scoops you’re a perfect target for my bumhole cards. But the bumhole card is not a balancing factor in the single player’s favor – sure, it cuts down on some of your scoops but I have to sacrifice all of mine to put a dent in your progress. For being a Troll and on my own, I think I’m doing rather well. But I’ll let you in on a hint – I’m done with that bracket. Log in to see images! Now, I’m just going to watch all hell break loose on Wednesday night. Should be a fun watch.
You can ****ing do it too, people! Send someone from your klan to apply to the Sisterhood. If they have a good enough Domination record, we’ll accept them and they can read all our secrets on the forum. Go on, I challenge you.
I doubt you accept Trolls. As I said, if you can’t join ‘em, hate ‘em. Log in to see images! (view post) |
03/11/2008 |
![]() |
Vanilla Re-evaluation?Bubo Posted:
I really don’t care how you did it, honestly. If you’d take a look at the clan I’m in now, it’s fairly obvious that I’m not very interested in vanilla scoops myself. However, if you’re going to keep your little secret about exactly how you do these raids (and by all means, go right ahead), don’t expect me or most others to sympathize with how much ‘work’ you say you’re doing.
I wasn’t implying anything by my observation. It was an observation, not an interpretation. Stop looking for stuff to quibble about – I’m the troll here, not you Log in to see images!. And just out of curiosity, I went back and read all of the posts prior to that, and yes, my observation was accurate.
If you can’t join ‘em, hate ‘em. Log in to see images!
Anyhow, the thread was originally about how most solo players have very little chance of acquiring vanilla scoops without sacrificing four others for a card, which is obviously a horribly inefficient method. But hey, in the end it’s up to Evil Trout whether or not he’d like clans to dominate Domination. Let’s not fool ourselves here – by the time enough clans arise to overlap each other on Vanilla raids… well, that’s not likely to happen for quite a long while. Until then, clans like the Sisters can raid without worry of their raiding being spoiled by more than just a few random guys playing the game on their own – which at the current time DOES give you an unfair advantage, as members of your clan who didn’t bother to even show up to your raid get free scoops, while a single player would have to sacrifice many of his or her forum visits for just one – if they were lucky and if they were playing at an off hour. This needs to be fixed in a method which will give players the option of raiding with their clan or raiding on their own – both giving relatively equal rewards. (view post) |
03/11/2008 |
![]() |
Sorting cardsPlus one to whatever’s above. (view post) |
03/11/2008 |
![]() |
Vanilla Re-evaluation?Bubo Posted:
I made an observation, not a conspiracy theory. Get your eyes checked – they’re clearly not working right.
As far as ‘organizing’ it goes, honestly you’re likely making a huge deal out of relatively nothing. All it takes is to bumign at least one (preferrably more) person to each forum in the game. Get everyone on teamspeak. When the last person is ready to pwn their forum, count 3, 2, 1, GO! and everyone finishes off their forum. It goes at the speed of however fast the hardest forum can be pwned. Other than getting people to be at their computer at a certain time and what I’ve already described, what you’re talking about is relatively simple, and there’s no reason why the ‘organizer’ can’t participate as well. As far as I’m concerned, either you did a LOT of unnecessary work or you didn’t, and the sisters are just ****ing about the little that they did for the extreme advantage that they have over people who don’t like to mbum-recruit camwhores to their clan. (view post) |
03/11/2008 |
is this a bug?Thanks for the extra visits – got a few cards off at the Sisters because of it. (view post) |
03/10/2008 | |
![]() |
Vanilla Re-evaluation?I love how every, if not most, people in this thread so far who have defended how the Vanilla scoops are gained at the moment are currently in the Sisterhood. A curious observation, indeed. (view post) |
03/10/2008 |
![]() |
Need moar shock.owned by photobucket (view post) |
03/10/2008 |
![]() |
Clix da link for free xxxSo, are you the **** eating **** on the left, or the bowel **** on the right? (view post) |
03/09/2008 |
![]() |
Hai PETALog in to see images!
Log in to see images! (view post) |
03/07/2008 |
![]() |
sisterhood of the blah blah blah klan are sellouts!Your dog gets more than “respect” from you.
I also heard that you own some horses and goats. Picz? (view post) |
03/07/2008 |
![]() |
Democratic Primary: Super Tuesday 2The bumumption that McCain is just more of the same is the Democrat’s weakness. Unless of course you consider their weakness to be how their party is split, or that they can’t figure out what to do with Florida and Michigan, or the existence of the superdelegates, or… etc. (view post) |
03/07/2008 |
![]() |
Democratic Primary: Super Tuesday 2Well of course it’s a subjective argument. Unless of course you’d like to get into how Obama has actually voted, which I’m sure wouldn’t work into your argument much, considering that he’s more liberal than Senator Kennedy of Mbumachusetts. Contrary to popular belief, he is not a unifier. He won’t have the support of Republicans under any cirgreat timesstances (his opinions are way too far to the left, a compromise on most issues just won’t happen) and he’s got no record of “reaching across the aisle” like he promises. But McCain does, and that’s why he’ll be getting the independent vote in November.
But hey, that’s all to come. First, the Democrats have to figure out what they’re doing with Florida and Michigan. Sounds good to me – if they’re not counted, Clinton supporters will feel betrayed. If they are counted, Obama supporters will be shafted. If there’s a new primary/caucus, then the Democrats get to spend their money on campaigning against each other instead of against McCain, as well as financing the primaries themselves. We’ll see how the race goes, there’s still months and months to go. (view post) |
03/07/2008 |
![]() |
HAY GYSYou missed a letter in your title. HAY GAYS! (view post) |
03/06/2008 |
![]() |
Democratic Primary: Super Tuesday 2Pimptastic, Obama does not work well with Republicans. His claim of ‘reaching across the aisle’ is unfounded. When you look at how both Clinton and Obama have voted in the Senate, you find that they are far left, not moderate. As a Republican, I can tell you that neither I, nor any other Republican I know support or agree with Obama or Clinton in the slightest. McCain is the moderate one here; if you look at the poll numbers you can tell that the far right actually doesn’t agree with him on a LOT of issues. However, that’s not so much of a problem for us as it is an bumet. The far right won’t vote for Obama or Clinton or Nader, leaving them only one choice available – McCain. McCain will also pull a huge number of independents, especially those who lean toward the right on economic and foreign policy, but also those who agree with some of the more liberal decisions that he’s made.
But I can tell you what we’re all hoping for – more posts like Perogi’s. The longer this fight goes on, the better. No matter which candidate is selected by the Democrats, their party will still be split due to the super-delegates. Unless one of them breaks off and starts pulling 70-30 victories in major states, neither one of them can reach the number of delegates that they need to claim the nomination. This leaves the super-delegates in the position of having to choose which one goes on. Do remember that the Clintons are very, very good at doing “back-room deals” and I wouldn’t be surprised to see her walk out of the DNC as their nominee. Which of course would really **** off a lot of people, but hey, either you vote for her or you vote for McCain, or you throw your vote away on Nader. And the reverse is true, as well, if Obama walks away with the nomination.
In any case, I agree with you that a President needs to surround himself with intelligent people. However, that’s not an outright replacement for personal experience. Yes, Obama has had a very good education… but books can only carry you so far. Being out there and involved in the political arena is the best form of experience that anyone can have prior to becoming President, and although one term is okay, I think that McCain or Clinton totally beast Obama on this issue – considering they’ve been actively involved with politics for decades. (view post) |
03/06/2008 |
![]() |
Democratic Primary: Super Tuesday 2No, we won’t be having a Democrat this year. You’re right – the Democrats have been getting more people to show up in the primaries. But why is that, you may ask… it’s because they still have a competition going as to who their nominee will be. When you consider that the Republicans who are showing up to vote are doing so to show their support for the Republican party, not because their vote will change anything (McCain was already bumured the nomination a while ago), the Republicans are doing quite well.
Furthermore, I believe that the both of you are underestimating McCain. He’s got a lot of policies that make sense when you think about them, and he’s got a lifetime of experience behind him. Don’t forget that back in 2000, McCain was running against Bush for the nomination. We may have made a mistake then, but hey, we can fix it this time by electing McCain.
As far as Obama goes, I’m sure that as time goes on, his lack of experience will fail him. Immediately after the last debate of his against Clinton, I heard the reporter make a comment that I think is absolutely 100% accurate. The reporter said something along the lines of: “Obama seems to do very well when he’s on his own on the campaign trail. He’s absolutely spectacular when he’s alone in front of a group of people with a teleprompter in front of him. But when he’s placed into a debate setting where he has to think on his own, his performance takes a big hit.” The other two candidates have years and years of experience talking in public, which I think will be a big disadvantage to Obama. Whether he can improve upon that is his own issue, of course. What he can’t easily improve on are the fallible policies that he’s proposed, or lack of. Every time he speaks, I hear him talk about ‘hope’ and how he has risen from mediocre beginnings and that ‘change’ is possible. For sake of brevity, I won’t go into each and every issue at the moment, but I think everyone should take a look at how both Clinton and Obama are planning to finance their multi-billion-dollar expenditures.
I hear both of those candidates say that they’d like to stop the war in Iraq immediately, and the money that would have been spent there will be spent on our infrastructure and on education and the hundreds of things that they’ve promised the American people so far. The problem with that is… stopping the war won’t generate money. Yeah, it’ll stop the expenditure, that’s great! But if you’re just planning on continuing to spend that money, well, take a look at the national debt. That’s where the money is coming from. We don’t have the finances to go on a spending spree at the moment – we’re still paying off debts from decades ago. What will happen is that the Democrats will increase taxes on everyone in order to counter this imbalance. They won’t target just the rich – they’re rich, so what incentive do they have to tax themselves? As an example, I give you a portion of Obama’s education plan. $4000 to every college-bound student, and all that’s asked in return is some community service! Sounds great… except for the math. $4000 times every college student is a LOT of money. How does a government pay for things? Taxes. So although he’s giving you $4000 up front, you have to watch how much extra you have to pay him when tax-time comes around. I bumure you that the community service and the $4000 likely won’t be worth your time.
My ideas on Clinton are roughly identical to my ideas on Obama, minus the inexperience part but add the earplugs for the shrill voice. Great promises, not so great reality.
And as far as his age… he’s in good health. Other than that, I don’t understand why his age could possibly be negative. (view post) |
03/05/2008 |
![]() |
Domination DiscussionYou’ll probably want to finish Episode 1 first, so that you can focus more on Domination than getting Cred. You’ll also have more stats and more powerful attacks, so it’ll be easier to get scoops. (view post) |
03/05/2008 |
![]() |
How do you Forumwarriorz feel about my man Ralph Nader?I Log in to see images! (view post) |
03/05/2008 |