You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.
You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.
asdf123's Flamebate Posts
View asdf123's Profile
Search Results | ||
---|---|---|
Negative Secondary Attributes?Few days ago
Fixed in a couple of minutes. (view post) |
11/07/2008 | |
![]() |
"Illegal Enhacement" suggestion...sort of.TreyOlson Posted: I could use that level to buy higher equipment to use for gaining e-peen and other things legitimately when I repent.
Even if you paid, that would make things unbalanced. (view post) |
11/06/2008 |
![]() |
"Illegal Enhacement" suggestion...sort of.TreyOlson Posted: I could use that level to buy higher equipment to use for gaining e-peen and other things legitimately when I repent.
Even if you paid, that would make things unbalanced. (view post) |
11/06/2008 |
![]() |
"Illegal Enhacement" suggestion...sort of.How would that be possible if all the applied illegal enhancements are on real-time?
There can be an option of a complete reset, however I presume this has been suggested already. (view post) |
11/06/2008 |
![]() |
Presidential Election 2008The most ironic thing about this contest is it’s not a contest at all.
Also:
While custom titles are necessarily good, an e-peen is permanent. After all, permanent and temporary are two different things.
You could change anyone’s custom title anyway.
”Every active user on Forumwarz will receive a bonus of 4 Forum Visits.” vs. ”Every active account will receive a special and unique item.” McCain certainly has points on this one, as said. Though the item must certainly be special, one that has more bonuses than the e-peen. Then again peen whores like to acgreat timesulate, and since a unique item is -singular-, while the e-peen is -great timesulative-, everyone gets the idea.
”Since I am a socialist, I will tax the richest active Forumwarz accounts by 25% and spread it amongst the poorest active accounts.” vs. ”Since I am a capitalist, I will tax the poorest active accounts by 25% and spread it amongst the wealthy active accounts.” 1 to 100. (Higher being the richest.) My guess is that the 25% of the 90 to 100 shall be deducted and be distributed to the lowest 20 to 1?
”I will tax the poorest active accounts by 25% and spread it amongst the wealthy active accounts.” Using simple math, I am to conclude that all new users will vote for this. (view post) |
11/04/2008 |