Moniker Posted:

I can respect that. I take it your beliefs involve some sort of creator? Something like deism, at the very least?

I’d be interested to know why you believe what you believe. The onus is not on me to disprove God, it’s on believers to prove what they believe is true. See Russell’s Teapot for more.

But bumuming the burden of proof is on me, what sort of shatter-proof argument would be acceptable? Only I can’t imagine what I could say to disprove the existence of something that supposedly exists outside of time and space.

Expect the onus is not on believers either, because the entire notion of “God” falls outside of logical constraints. There will never be a “proof” either way. All you will have is a belief in God and your faith to back it, or a non-belief in God and your faith to back it.