Fingerz Posted:

^^^No.

If your rules had been better (read: more clearly) defined, to EVERYONE, there may have been an ENTIRELY DIFFERENT top 3. So that logic that the top 3 wouldn’t have been changed regardless of the rules just doesn’t work.

It’s just not right. But, whatever. I’d say “Have fun with your contest-rigging” but I’d be banned for trolling so I’ll just say “I’m out”. Good job to the “winners” tho, they were p funny. It’s just too bad that not everyone got the memo that multiple entries were allowed in the contest where only one entry was allowed. There’s no flies in vaseline here, JB, just me pointing out that preferential treatment continues to proliferate to an almost nauseating height here on Forumwarz.

I don’t really know what’s got you in such a fuss, I think the rules were pretty damn cut and dry:

• The lines can be standalone parts of conversation, or they can be a series of back-and-forth dialog, or any combination thereof — your choice, but you only get five.

That states about as clearly as possible that the “multiple entries” you’re in such a fuss about were perfectly legitimate.