Professor Falken Posted:

You can’t prove the existence of a “God” either way. Thing is, there is no clear, objective definition of what he/she/it/they even is/are; the possible combinations are infinite, especially because they can include certain “fuzzy” attributes that can not be defined or validated either, such as “just” and “almighty”. And if you can give him/her/it/them any attribute whatsoever – including unmeasurable ones – how could you determine whether or not it exists? Even if you you try to analyse certain attributes – such as “answers prayers” – the result still is open to discussion. Sure, it seems silly, but even if you end up with data that appears to contradict the existence of a “God”, you can simply switch attributes or revise definitions or challenge to process or something like that, and the data doesn’t apply anymore.

End of discussion. Log in to see images!

Well you can still check out the site, it has 52 reasons why. I think at least one of them will convince you.