The theory of moral relativism teaches that different cultures cannot be judged by the standards of whatever culture you are a part of, and that basically, all cultures are equivalent.

This leads to the very popular ideal (which has generally been embraced as a “good moral”Log in to see images! the ideal of tolerance.

The problem with that, (outside of the fact that moral relativism is in fact, proveably bunk) is that we are now being told that we must tolerate everyone and everything EXCEPT for those who are INTOLERANT.

Moral relativism and tolerance brings our society down to the LOWEST common denominator, by bumuming that all cultures are equal, when they are NOT. By tolerating things WHICH ARE WRONG, we WEAKEN our own culture.

By telling people to tolerate things which they should NOT tolerate, but should rather, be actively opposing, we are weakening our society, which is precisely what these people WANT.

They want a society so afraid of offending anyone, that it will be easy to take away our RIGHTS to disagree with whatever or whoever is in power.

They WANT us all afraid of being labeled “intolerant” because then it will be easy to keep you all in line, and keep you from seeing the truth of how they are using this bull**** to weaken our society and take away YOUR rights to disagree with something you feel is WRONG.

Well, I for one AM intolerant!

I am intolerant of Muslims who believe that they have the God given right to kill people who are non muslims, just because they’re bull**** made up Koran says they can.

And I am intolerant of people who, with their noses up in the air, and a smug look upon their self important faces, tell me that MY culture is NOT superior to a culture where women are kept in virtual servitude, and where children are being raised to become suicide bombers.

**** YOU! My culture IS SUPERIOR and I will NOT tolerate the things I am being told I must tolerate.

I don’t ****ing HAVE to and you cannot ****ing MAKE ME! Though I dare you all to try.

Your attempt to mock the thread, makes it no less the TRUTH!

Simply dismissing a thread out of hand, for the style in which it was posted, does nothing to lessen the importance of the thread itself.

Also, making a comparison between someone ranting about hockey, to someone ranting about a prevelant ideal in society, utterly fails, the two are hardly equivalent.

A worthy attempt at trolling…but ultimately it falls short, since the two things should not be given the same weight. Hockey is simply a game, whereas moral relativism and Tolerance are values which directly affect the decision making processes of world leaders…the comparison fails.

And saying **** YOU is always the last resort of a mind which cannot formulate a cohesive argument against an opinion which has been expressed.

Saying **** you, is NOT a comeback, is not clever, and is not an argument against what was said.

Though it is very fun to say.

Camwhores who try to troll should quit, they aren’t very good at it.

Leave trolling to trolls hon, and I will leave the posting of nude pictures, and the sucking of my male reproductive organ to you.

fenk the evil midnight stabber Posted:

And saying **** YOU is always the last resort of a mind which cannot formulate a cohesive argument against an opinion which has been expressed.

Saying **** you, is NOT a comeback, is not clever, and is not an argument against what was said.

Though it is very fun to say.

Camwhores who try to troll should quit, they aren’t very good at it.

Leave trolling to trolls hon, and I will leave the posting of nude pictures, and the sucking of my male reproductive organ to you.

SAYS THE DUMB **** WHO HAS THE **** YOU SIGN AS AN AVATAR

BirdofPrey Posted:

sg is cooler than you

fenk the evil midnight stabber Posted:

As I said, saying **** you is FUN.

I like to say it, over and over and over again, **** YOU **** YOU **** YOU.

But as much fun as it is to say, it is NOT a worthy attempt at a comeback.

It is simply an emotion expressed. Usually **** you is said, because they have nothing to say which can directly combat the argument expressed. So they simply become angry and say **** YOU.

Any moron can say **** you, saying **** you does not make good trolling.

And SG might in fact be cooler than me, she is certainly hotter than me, but that also has nothing to do with my argument against tolerance and relativism.

But thanks for playing. Stop coming to a battle of wits unarmed.

In your friendless life it maybe that way, but it can also be like this. Example:

Nr 1: hi wil u be mi frind i liek yu!

Nr 2: **** you

So.. Nr 1 the moron idiot who has no friends (YOU)

Nr 2 Everyone in TSB and Klan und der Flan

fenk the evil midnight stabber Posted:

This response fails for two reasons.

Firstly it fails, because it bumumes that I should care that members of these two clans told me to **** off…I do not.

Secondly it fails, because it bumumes I want friends…I do not, I hate everyone snd do NOT want friends. Therefore, I would never ask to become one.

’’Arktor approved as a friend. 3:22PM’’

OWNED!

To be fair there are other ethical systems which are just as bad if not worse than moral relativism when put into practice. For example utilitarianism which is based around making the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people. While in theory this looks good it can allow some pretty horrific things to happen. for example if the majority of a country’s population decided they wanted to wipe out a minority group then that would be morally just under utilitarianism. Therefore if you follow this theory you could support Germany’s actions in the second world war in the holocaust. So moral relativism isn’t too bad if you compare it too utilitarianism.

Funk-e-ham Posted:

To be fair there are other ethical systems which are just as bad if not worse than moral relativism when put into practice. For example utilitarianism which is based around making the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people. While in theory this looks good it can allow some pretty horrific things to happen. for example if the majority of a country’s population decided they wanted to wipe out a minority group then that would be morally just under utilitarianism. Therefore if you follow this theory you could support Germany’s actions in the second world war in the holocaust. So moral relativism isn’t too bad if you compare it too utilitarianism.

While true, and I agree, this doesn’t address the points I made. I do agree that, any ethical system, if taken to it’s extreme can become a nightmare for someone…but that still does not address my points.

fenk the evil midnight stabber Posted:

While true, and I agree, this doesn’t address the points I made. I do agree that, any ethical system, if taken to it’s extreme can become a nightmare for someone…but that still does not address my points.

Haha, I pwned you to death and you’re not replying ahahah ****ing loser!