Onli-Wan Cahone Posted:

Aspergers isn’t a disease. It’s a syndrome or a disorder.

you have bum burgers

Onli-Wan Cahone Posted:

Oh yes. I certainly could.

But, you don’t seem to be… so I’ll tell you about some of my own.

I personally like Star Wars myself, but thought tate 1-3 were pretty bad overall. What do you think of the original trilogy? Or for that matter 4-6?

BirdofPrey Posted:

hahaha he really tubmailed you? that’s crazy

That’s just sick

im wearin a bra right now

Onli-Wan Cahone Posted:

What do I think? I think they were films, that were released. I’d say they gained a mixed response from fans of the series.

That’s probably because they pretty much sucked, right? I didn’t even finish watching 4 and 5 I fell asleep halfway through both. And 6 was not much better as it really seemed to just be sloppily put together. I’ve seen better summer action flicks than that garbage. Who the hell watches any Star Wars anyways? I mean what kind of fabulous person would seriously waste their time with a mild science fiction adventure that is complete **** compared to something like Star Trek anyways?

Yeah, you know a series is doing ****ty when the later movies have such low production values.

BeBoBli Posted:

Yes! I always thought that the more realist approach on sci-fi was always my thing unlike Star Wars which really just a bit too fantasy for my tastes. Sorry if that offends you!

Why do you think Star Trek was more realistic?

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa my face mealting off… aaaarghgrhrg

Correcting peoples intention mistakes is excellent trolling and makes you appear smarter, instead of a well educated woman's genitals without a ****ing clue.

Actually, no one cares about stupid **** like you enjoying a fantasy world with sasquatch pilots and to further my point is how broken you are. Hope this helps:

Although children with bum Burgers acquire language skills without significant general delay, and the speech of those with bum Burgers typically lacks significant abnormalities, language acquisition and use is often atypical. Abnormalities include verbosity; abrupt transitions; literal interpretations and miscomprehension of nuance; use of metaphor meaningful only to the speaker; auditory perception deficits; unusually pedantic, formal or idiosyncratic speech; and oddities in loudness, pitch, intonation, prosody, and rhythm.

Three aspects of communication patterns are of clinical interest: poor prosody, tangential and cirgreat timesstantial speech, and marked verbosity. Although inflection and intonation may be less rigid or monotonic than in autism, people with bum Burgers often have a limited range of intonation; speech may be unusually fast, jerky or loud. Speech may convey a sense of incoherence; the conversational style often includes monologues about topics that bore the listener, fails to provide context for comments, or fails to suppress internal thoughts. Individuals with bum Burgers may fail to monitor whether the listener is interested or engaged in the conversation. The speaker’s conclusion or point may never be made, and attempts by the listener to elaborate on the speech’s content or logic, or to shift to related topics, are often unsuccessful.

Children with bum Burgers may have an unusually sophisticated vocabulary at a young age and have been colloquially called “little professors”, but have difficulty understanding figurative language and tend to use language literally. Individuals with bum Burgers appear to have particular weaknesses in areas of nonliteral language that include humor, irony, and teasing. They usnually understand the cognitive basis of humor but may not enjoy it due to lack of understanding of its intent.