You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.
You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.
Can we get a list of who can post something potentially controversial? | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
I just feel like things would go far more smoothly and end up with less time wasted if we could simply have a list of those who can post something that is potentially controversial or argument inducing without having the topic closed.
Is this a special thing where if plk doesn’t happen to think the topic is valid that settles it? I mean I know they are busy, but if there is a new voice of the admins it would be nice to know.
Note: I realize this may be problematic if I don’t happen to be on the “ok to post” list, but it’s a chance I’m willing to take. |
||||||
Posted On: 08/20/2010 9:19PM | View scully's Profile | # | ||||||
|
One of my on-topic non-trolling post anywhere in Flamebate is actually potentially controversial. |
||||||
Posted On: 08/20/2010 9:27PM | View The nerd o powa's Profile | # | ||||||
|
I would respond to this but I’m not on said list so I think I’d be breaking some rules or something. |
||||||
Posted On: 08/20/2010 9:27PM | View megazeroexe's Profile | # | ||||||
|
I will gladly post potentially controversial topics in CD. No charge, but I will edit out anything that outright violates the rules. |
||||||
Posted On: 08/20/2010 9:33PM | View Count_Smurf's Profile | # | ||||||
|
i think the women of forumwarz are syncing |
||||||
Posted On: 08/20/2010 10:09PM | View TUBSWEETIE's Profile | # | ||||||
|
megazeroexe Posted:
|
||||||
Posted On: 08/20/2010 11:28PM | View Bacchus's Profile | # | ||||||
|
TUBSWEETIE Posted:
and natalie feared this day would never come |
||||||
Posted On: 08/20/2010 11:46PM | View Fortunato's Profile | # | ||||||
|
well i know i can |
||||||
Posted On: 08/21/2010 3:43AM | View Patently Chill P...'s Profile | # | ||||||
i think i am on this list. hope this helps! Log in to see images! |
|||||||
Posted On: 08/21/2010 4:02AM | View Odalisque's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Odalisque Posted: |
||||||
Posted On: 08/22/2010 5:11PM | View Fortunato's Profile | # | ||||||
|
New entry for this list: http://www.forumwarz.com/discussions/view/52990-episode-buildr-could-it-possibly-work |
||||||
Posted On: 08/24/2010 5:14PM | View Adapt's Profile | # | ||||||
|
especially when the poster of that episode buildr thing sits and ‘trolls’ RP all day by posting like a skyman that cares |
||||||
Posted On: 08/24/2010 5:16PM | View megazeroexe's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Adapt Posted:
First one is now closed.
As for m0x’s thread – I didn’t close that because he wasn’t being serious, I closed it because the troll-bait was out of control. There was no way to salvage that thread and keep it civil. And since I did actually think he was serious, it didn’t merit a move to RP.
If you want to say a mod made a ****ty decision, at least make sure you have the reasons for the decision right before criticizing. |
||||||
Posted On: 08/24/2010 5:38PM | View spacekadt's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Those threads weren’t even the same thing though. One of them mox wants to be serious and one of them that insperaoskdjfa;lskdfja;sdlk dude is trying to be stupid. I am criticizing everyone’s reaction and those two mods decisions to not close that thread sooner, but independently; I am hardly saying they are the same thing. You don’t have to lump everything together like that. Adapt edited this message on 08/24/2010 5:45PM |
||||||
Posted On: 08/24/2010 5:44PM | View Adapt's Profile | # | ||||||
|
But good call on closing chelasdlfjkasdlfkjasdl;kfj’s thing. |
||||||
Posted On: 08/24/2010 5:46PM | View Adapt's Profile | # | ||||||
|
I guess you can take him off the list. |
||||||
Posted On: 08/24/2010 5:48PM | View Adapt's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Adapt Posted:
I’m not saying you were lumping. I was addressing your comment that m0x’s thread was closed because no one thought he was being serious. I use paragraphs for a reason. They distinctly separate thoughts and subjects. The last paragraph in my post is (to me, anyway) a pretty logical extension of the second… but just in case it didn’t make sense to someone else… the remark about getting reasons right before criticizing referred to the bumumed reason for closing m0x’s thread.
As for Chelmey’s thread, there was a legit call for an answer. Kinda. EpisodeBuildr has been a running joke for a while and most people know that. Did Chelmey? Probably. But for all the people that didn’t, now it’s answered. |
||||||
Posted On: 08/24/2010 5:49PM | View spacekadt's Profile | # | ||||||
|
spacekadt Posted:
Actually it’s not. Because once it drops off of the active list, there’s no way to find it again. Flamebate search won’t pick it up. |
||||||
Posted On: 08/24/2010 6:45PM | View MC Banhammer's Profile | # | ||||||
|
MC Banhammer Posted:
/me hastily inserts “for” into her above post
Yeah, I know the search won’t pick that thread up now, but the other option was letting it be trolled into oblivion. So for the search feature – EpisodeBuildr (or episode builder or buildr – there, I think I covered the search terms) is a running joke and has about as much chance as becoming reality as I have of winning the lottery. (Note: I don’t play, I’m not likely to win) |
||||||
Posted On: 08/24/2010 7:11PM | View spacekadt's Profile | # | ||||||
|
scully Posted:
As usual everyone is way off topic in this thread.
Scully the correct answer to your question is this:
You, me, was and a maybe two or three other people I can’t think of right now. There might be a few others but since I won’t read their posts I don’t care. |
||||||
Posted On: 08/24/2010 7:45PM | View Malaise's Profile | # | ||||||