You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.
You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.
There should be an E-Peen for toping the E-Peen Leaderboard | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
And it should decrease E-Peen length.
Just saying. SoronTheBeast edited this message on 11/11/2009 2:33PM |
||||||
Posted On: 11/10/2009 7:35PM | View SoronTheBeast's Profile | # | ||||||
|
I support this. I mean it’s almost a year that the same person has been on top, someone do something about it. At least negative 2 inches, imo. |
||||||
Posted On: 11/10/2009 7:46PM | View Psychotic Vengea...'s Profile | # | ||||||
|
Psychotic Vengeance Posted:
I’m always ready to try a new position Log in to see images! |
||||||
Posted On: 11/10/2009 8:01PM | View quangntenemy's Profile | # | ||||||
|
SoronTheBeast Posted:
If you’re after something that ‘decrees’ E-Peen length, you might be after this thread. |
||||||
Posted On: 11/11/2009 7:36AM | **** Corp | # | ||||||
|
Ok, and then the guy who was in 2nd place is now in first place so he gets 2 inches chopped off his peen, and now the guy who was in third is now on top and gets a couple inches chopped off his pecker… and…
You see how you didn’t actually think this all the way through? |
||||||
Posted On: 11/11/2009 8:46AM | male reproductive organFACEPANTS | # | ||||||
|
I got a few guaranteed peens comin my way, I’ll be pbumin her soon enough, don’t worry Log in to see images!
Also lol decrees. Johnny Mac edited this message on 11/11/2009 9:08AM |
||||||
Posted On: 11/11/2009 9:08AM | View Johnny Mac's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Bill the Butcher Posted: You did not think YOUR statement all the way though, Silly Billy.
At some point the person on top would be on top again, but they would have already GOTTEN the E-Peen, so they would not lose the # again, and stay on top.
Lets say its -2 inches. http://www.forumwarz.com/leaderboard/epeen_length?page=1 Scully would drop, Amasius would get it and drop, but then Scully would be in the lead again at 26.49” and would not drop because she already has the E-Peen and would not get it again. Johnny Mac would NOT have gotten it yet, and would be right behind at 26.44”. If he got another +.06 he WOULD get it, making Scully #1 again, with plk in second.
Silly Billy. |
||||||
Posted On: 11/11/2009 9:58AM | View SoronTheBeast's Profile | # | ||||||
|
I decrease this idea really stupid.
See wat I did there? Log in to see images! |
||||||
Posted On: 11/11/2009 10:01AM | View Johnny Mac's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Johnny Mac Posted: |
||||||
Posted On: 11/11/2009 10:22AM | View SoronTheBeast's Profile | # | ||||||
|
SoronTheBeast Posted:
Ah. So your idea would cycle the peen through the top few, and then the top would still be out of reach for everyone else.
Bad idea downvoted. |
||||||
Posted On: 11/11/2009 10:23AM | View MC Banhammer's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Realistically a peen of no value could make sense, but that’s about it. |
||||||
Posted On: 11/11/2009 10:26AM | View Johnny Mac's Profile | # | ||||||
|
MC Banhammer Posted:
Well, I know my E-Peen is small, this has nothing to do with me.
But, depending on the size of the decrease it WOULD make the top more accessible for everyone. Since when you hit the top for the first time you would lose it. 24.47” is closer to 26.44” than 28.44”.
However, like I said, this has nothing to do with me, if you guys with 20+ don’t like the idea, than that is that. SoronTheBeast edited this message on 11/11/2009 4:52PM |
||||||
Posted On: 11/11/2009 10:28AM | View SoronTheBeast's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Peens for getting a lot of peens?
What’s next? Scoops for getting a lot of scoops? Log in to see images! |
||||||
Posted On: 11/11/2009 1:30PM | View SanDyk's Profile | # | ||||||
|
SanDyk Posted: |
||||||
Posted On: 11/11/2009 2:47PM | View MC Banhammer's Profile | # | ||||||
|
This would only result in the top few cycling through every time one of the top few got a new Domination Peen. There would be a new holder every time a random person got a few valuable peens, but nothing would generally change.
Sorry, but I agree that you really DIDN’T think it through. |
||||||
Posted On: 11/11/2009 3:01PM | View Drakodan's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Drakodan Posted:I’m not sure I see the logic in your post. Currently, one person has been on top for ~a year, which is an example of “nothing changing.” My suggestion would make it so the “top few” would get to be the “top one” when they get an increase, which is an example of “a change.” Maybe I’m missing something. Drakodan Posted: Well, I did not give a number for the decrease. For example, if you made it -10, it would do more than “cycle through” the top few. I don’t think it should be -10, but depending on the number of the decrease you could make it ‘cycle through’ however many people you would want it to. |
||||||
Posted On: 11/11/2009 3:48PM | View SoronTheBeast's Profile | # | ||||||
|
i agree with jmac on this |
||||||
Posted On: 11/11/2009 4:22PM | View ChilePepino's Profile | # | ||||||
Why should it give length at all? It’s a meta-peen anyway.
Why not give an e-peen to those that have the most leaderboard peens, too? Then give an e-peen to those that have the biggest e-peen e-peen and the most leaderboard e-peen e-peen. That would be a meta-meta-peen. Let’s just get ridiculous with the whole idea.
tl;dr Bad idea, downvoted.
Edit: Forgot an e-peen. Sneaky27 edited this message on 11/11/2009 4:29PM |
|||||||
Posted On: 11/11/2009 4:27PM | View Sneaky27's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Psychotic Vengeance Posted:
also lol at this post Log in to see images! |
||||||
Posted On: 11/11/2009 4:30PM | View ChilePepino's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Sneaky27 Posted: The suggestion is that it would “give” a negative length. |
||||||
Posted On: 11/11/2009 4:34PM | View SoronTheBeast's Profile | # | ||||||