You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.
You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.
Pretty fair
|
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Is it fair when some players are teaming up, so that one of them is going to beat the domination, and others are responsible to screw current leader or runner-up with domination cards? Theyre not goaling to the win, so they spending all of their scoop on domination cards to screw anyone who is in the way of they leader!
We need some new rules! Like not allowing to use cards on the player that is far away from you!!! |
|||||||
| Posted On: 10/06/2009 6:16PM |
Rate this Post: -4
View kvazar's Profile
|
#
  |
||||||
|
I think you’re missing the point of “Domination”... |
|||||||
| Posted On: 10/06/2009 6:18PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View mterek's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
Is there anyone or anything stopping you from doing the same? |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/06/2009 6:24PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View Fran's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
How the Phillip Morris im missing anything? There is a mechanism that is used to include equal players on the same domination team. It means that if any 2 players will team up, they will have unfair addvantage over other players.
So u mean like what, i should team up with someone else? |
|||||||
| Posted On: 10/06/2009 6:25PM |
Rate this Post: -2
View kvazar's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
Fran Posted:
Yeah, i dont have time to teamup with somebody. And thats unfair for newbies, they dont have friends, and this is not some WoW to live in. (i dont live in WoW either, but anyway…Log in to see images! |
|||||||
| Posted On: 10/06/2009 6:27PM |
Rate this Post: -2
View kvazar's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
Fran Posted:
not if they have 0 scoops or cards on hand. There’s someone who’s currently attacking me. seems like they don’t want me to win even though I’m nowhere near winning or have no intention to this week |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/06/2009 6:30PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View SanDyk's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
Some people take great pleasure, in the weeks when they don’t have a shot at a medal, in turning in all their scoops for cards and blitzing the board to shake things up and make it harder for anyone to maintain a lead.
Others form ad-hoc alliances to try to tie for a medal instead of competing with each other or on a reciprocal basis (helping someone one week for the promise of help in another week). Further others will know each other and co-operate on that basis, or have klan allegiances to go by.
All of the above comes under “just part of the game”. If your scoop stack can’t stand up to the inevitable wave of attack cards, then you don’t win. I suggest buying more Shields. |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/06/2009 6:37PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View man-man's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
man-man Posted:
Yep. Honestly attacking like crazy is funny as hell. |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/06/2009 7:15PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View Fortunato's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
I have no problem with people teaming up. That’s just like, the social aspect of the game.
What I don’t like is the people who win have like 20 alts, and so their “friends” helping them are basically themselves. That’s the only way you can be a serious competitor in dom; It’d be much more interesting to see who would win if every person could only play with their main. Right now it’s only a contest of who can buy the most alts and spend the most tedious hours leveling/powering them up. |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/06/2009 7:24PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View Celerysteve's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
Celerysteve Posted:
Umm, that’s why they enabled a 5 alt limit? |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/06/2009 7:45PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View CrinkzPipe's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
Why don’t you join one of the klans of the people teaming up against you? I’m pretty sure We Chall will let anyone in. |
|||||||
| Posted On: 10/06/2009 7:51PM |
Rate this Post: 1
View Odalisque's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
CrinkzPipe Posted:
Did they really? I didn’t know that. |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/06/2009 7:56PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View Celerysteve's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
Celerysteve Posted:
Nice being way behind. And I mean WAYYY behind. CrinkzPipe edited this message on 10/06/2009 8:02PM |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/06/2009 8:01PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View CrinkzPipe's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
CrinkzPipe Posted:
Really? What do you mean by that? |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/06/2009 8:04PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View Celerysteve's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
Celerysteve Posted:
The limit on alts in dom happened a long time ago. |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/06/2009 8:05PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View CrinkzPipe's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
CrinkzPipe Posted:
How long ago did it happen? |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/06/2009 8:06PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View Celerysteve's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
kvazar Posted:
That being the entire point. |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/06/2009 8:22PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View Sarcasm Inc's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
Celerysteve Posted:
8-9 months ago-esque.
Yeah the whole alt change is pretty damn old.
And that’s the social aspect of Domination. People do that all the time when they realize they have no chance of winning by themselves, be it by having a lower streak than the lead (thus less on-demand scoops on the last minutes) or by simply not wanting to give it a try.
If they didn’t want us to interact with each other, we wouldn’t have features such as onymous stalls or even Peeping Toms. Fran edited this message on 10/06/2009 8:32PM |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/06/2009 8:28PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View Fran's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
|
kvazar Posted:
I agree with this completely!!! I always hated this about dom!!! It’s why I don’t have any medals!!! |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/06/2009 8:29PM |
Rate this Post: -1
I'm a huge fabulous persongo...
|
#
|
||||||
|
PROTIP: don’t make enemies. |
||||||
| Posted On: 10/06/2009 11:08PM |
Rate this Post: 0
View dobnits's Profile
|
#
|
||||||
