Buy Official Merchandise!
Forumwarz is the first "Massively Single-Player" online RPG completely built around Internet culture.

You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.

You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.

Log in or Learn about Forumwarz

Civil Discussion
Switch to Role-Playing Civil Discussion
FAQ 17 "Don'ts" For Men

Celerysteve

Avatar: 61989 2011-12-28 11:21:37 -0500
24

[Temple of the Anth-
ropomorphic Majesty
]

Level 35 Troll

Right from the moment when I saw Saw, I laughed.

Log in to see images!

0-1: A laudable gentleman of the highest caliber refinement.

2-3: At times brash in character, but still a respectable sort.

4-6: Uncouth and ill-tempered, with a notable lack of social graces.

7-10: Worthy of substantial reproach; an ignoble cad.

11+: A veritable knave of the lowliest persuasion.

OC not copy pasta BTW

AntiRules187

Avatar: 79421 Tue May 26 22:06:20 -0400 2009
2

[Temple of the Anth-
ropomorphic Majesty
]

Level 35 Troll

It's actually an honor to be pranked, it means someone spent real money on you. Sir.

I am saving that.

also, who knows where I can get that jacket like the guy in pic?

AntiRules187 edited this message on 08/02/2009 3:32AM

swine

Avatar: 10221 2011-10-31 21:15:57 -0400
28

[Harem and Sushi Bar]

Level 69 Troll

I congratulate you in recognising my superiority and choosing me to be your love pig!

No heated arguments on a summers day, unless you’re sporting well starched linen, eh? Confound it all! I suppose I’m going to have to stop quarreling in the nude. The junior debate team I sponsor is going to be so disappointed.

Celerysteve

Avatar: 61989 2011-12-28 11:21:37 -0500
24

[Temple of the Anth-
ropomorphic Majesty
]

Level 35 Troll

Right from the moment when I saw Saw, I laughed.

I posted this on 99chan’s Gentlemen board:

Ambrose Farnsworth III Posted:

Are not these rules guidance for the mere fop or entirely superficial man? As well, technology has allowed a loosening of these once practical rules.

Also, this code of dress seems designed for the turn of the 20th century, and is highly outdated.

An edit upon the code may be put forth, and applicable to men such as ourselves. Mayhaps a fashionable person will construe a slightly modified set of rules.

Some, however, are befitting to this day. in exemplum: the application of tight clothing; the rules of stripes; the law of gloves, for we all know, “if the glove don’t fit, you must acquit”.

Begging the pardon of the last gentleman, to so hastily dismiss the article in question as being superfluous materialism — why that in itself is no less than brazen poppymale reproductive organ and foolhardy disregard for the ways of civilized man. Do clothes not, as they say, make the man? Of what use is it to a man to be refined of speech yet course in appearance? Are we but the savages of the native negroid realms, disposed to equipping our appearance with remnants of animal carcbum and other such refuge as may strike us upon some whim? I dare say, good sir, any more such tomfoolery of that nature and I shan’t but question your attestation as to that of a fellow gentleman.

Good fellows, I implore perchance you will forgive my display of up in arms bravado in this matter. Such irresponsible and forgoing sentiments regarding one’s apparel tend to illicit my pbumion; I seek only to correct and provide guidance to my fellow gentlemen where it may hap behoove them.

Internet Delay Chat
Have fun playing!
To chat with other players, you must Join Forumwarz or Log In now!