Forumwarz is the first "Massively Single-Player" online RPG completely built around Internet culture.

You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.

You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.

Log in or Learn about Forumwarz

Civil Discussion
Switch to Role-Playing Civil Discussion
Macho Sex offenders forced to live under a bridge.

Xylon

Avatar: 76994 2010-01-16 02:54:34 -0500
6

[Kappa Kappa Kappa]

Level 35 Hacker

Posting personal information is fun. Everyone should try it at least once.

Sergeant Cid Posted:

Honestly, a lot of **** needs to be illegal while driving. I have very little confidence in the average human’s ability to multi-task, and when one of those tasks is maneuvering a 1000 lb piece of metal and fuel at 65 mph in heavy traffic, most people need to devote more attention to that task than they normally do.

“The Average Human” being the operative term. I personally believe all those with an IQ below 120 should be forced into indentured servitude or legal prostitution after sterilization.

Perhaps those drivers could be put in tent cities, where they are provided with basic food, clothing, and medical care? They could build the cars they wrecked to pay off their debt to society.

twas

Avatar: 40896 2011-11-01 00:47:59 -0400
15

[Forumwarz One Act -
Players
]

Level 35 Troll

Wher Have My Poor Imaginary Wife and Child Gone

Sergeant Cid Posted:

Honestly, a lot of **** needs to be illegal while driving. I have very little confidence in the average human’s ability to multi-task, and when one of those tasks is maneuvering a 1000 lb piece of metal and fuel at 65 mph in heavy traffic, most people need to devote more attention to that task than they normally do.

Driving is less complex than throwing a ball at a target.

Big Brother

Avatar: 45759 Fri Oct 17 23:44:23 -0400 2008

Level 66 Troll

woman's genitals

Xylon Posted:

”The Average Human” being the operative term. I personally believe all those with an IQ below 120 should be forced into indentured servitude or legal prostitution after sterilization.

...

...

...

But what about all the sexy women who DON’T have an IQ below 120?

Can you annoy them while they’re taking the test so they get a bad result?

Xylon

Avatar: 76994 2010-01-16 02:54:34 -0500
6

[Kappa Kappa Kappa]

Level 35 Hacker

Posting personal information is fun. Everyone should try it at least once.

Big Brother Posted:

...

...

...

But what about all the sexy women who DON’T have an IQ below 120?

Can you annoy them while they’re taking the test so they get a bad result?

Those are the ones we allow to breed.

Veer

Avatar: 2059 Thu Nov 13 08:18:14 -0500 2008
6

[Team Shortbus]

Level 32 Troll

my only complaint is that you people are happy

sex offender system doesn’t ****in work

“hmm if we make their lives miserable thatll stop them from having sex w/ kids”

StirFryKitty

Avatar: Leather Boots

Level 10 Camwhore

“Leave it to Cleavage”

I’m curious about what actually constitutes a sex offender in various places. In Florida it looks like you have to do something really nasty to get called a sex offender, so I can’t say I have much sympathy for their bridge plight. In days past in Oklahoma (where I live), however, if you were caught peeing in public you could get slapped with indecent exposure, which would then tag you as a sex offender, and being stuck under a bridge for peeing in public would seem like a really harsh punishment.

What do you all know about this?

MasterHaxxor

Avatar: Abstract Blue Circle

Level 25 Hacker

“Mafiaboy”

StirFryKitty Posted:

What do you all know about this?

I just checked the Florida sex offender registry’s FAQ and it seems like downloading certain pornography is enough to get you labeled as a sex offender and sent to live under a bridge, meaning many of those people may not have “Touched a Child” like some others ITT have said. Just for anyone curious, the offense is listed as “Computer pornography, excluding subsection 847.0135(4)” and the link to the page is http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/offender/FAQ.jsp (it’s in chart 1 under the first question)

StirFryKitty

Avatar: Leather Boots

Level 10 Camwhore

“Leave it to Cleavage”

MasterHaxxor Posted:

I just checked the Florida sex offender registry’s FAQ and it seems like downloading certain pornography is enough to get you labeled as a sex offender and sent to live under a bridge, meaning many of those people may not have “Touched a Child” like some others ITT have said. Just for anyone curious, the offense is listed as “Computer pornography, excluding subsection 847.0135(4)” and the link to the page is http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/offender/FAQ.jsp (it’s in chart 1 under the first question)

If you go a little further, though (http://www.leg.state.fl.us/STATUTES/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=Ch0847/titl0847.htm&StatuteYear=2008&Title=-%3E2008-%3EChapter%20847), that statute seems to suggest that the computer pornography includes intent to travel to meet a minor for illegal purposes. Of course, it’s 2am, and all the legal mumbo jumbo makes my brain hurt a bit, so I could be reading that wrong.

StirFryKitty

Avatar: Leather Boots

Level 10 Camwhore

“Leave it to Cleavage”

Of course, Florida still has statutes on the books about unmarried people living together and it being a misdemeanor, etc. So I’m not suggesting that Florida is doing it any better than anywhere else.

MasterHaxxor

Avatar: Abstract Blue Circle

Level 25 Hacker

“Mafiaboy”

StirFryKitty Posted:

Of course, Florida still has statutes on the books about unmarried people living together and it being a misdemeanor, etc. So I’m not suggesting that Florida is doing it any better than anywhere else.

Anyway, both “Transmission of child pornography by electronic device/equipment” and “Transmission of material harmful to minors to a minor by electronic device/equipment” are there, so it’s very possible for someone who has never touched a child to be a registered sex offender in Florida. About the one I posted before, I never looked into it too far, so I admit I could be wrong about that one.

StirFryKitty

Avatar: Leather Boots

Level 10 Camwhore

“Leave it to Cleavage”

On just my first search, I found a statistic (http://tiny.cc/W6M35) that says that 86% of sex offenders (for this statistic, these were offenders researched in the UK) admitted using child porn as a precurser to worse offenses.

I don’t feel that owning/transmitting child porn is any less severe than actually touching a child. Some child somewhere was violated to get those pictures. By owning/transmitting and probably paying for those pictures, you’re engaging in a form of child trafficking.

Big Brother

Avatar: 45759 Fri Oct 17 23:44:23 -0400 2008

Level 66 Troll

woman's genitals

Yeah, the real mess doesn’t start until drawings of children are considered CP.

Internet Delay Chat
Have fun playing!
To chat with other players, you must Join Forumwarz or Log In now!