Buy Official Merchandise!
Forumwarz is the first "Massively Single-Player" online RPG completely built around Internet culture.

You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.

You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.

Log in or Learn about Forumwarz

Civil Discussion
Switch to Role-Playing Civil Discussion
Ugly I Updated the Wiki Page on Forum Rules

-MLF-

Avatar: 83146 Sun Jan 18 18:56:12 -0500 2009
6

Level 60 Hacker

“Cracking Addict”

http://www.forumwarz.com/spoilers/wiki/Site_Rules

I’d like if a mod could check this out, make any necessary corrections/additions, but keep it in the format of having one place with every rule.

And I am still in favor of a “You are posting in a RPG forum whose rules were updated recently! Don’t know why this is important? See here!

EDIT: I’m having difficulty putting in a table of contents, can someone familiar with the MediaWiki syntax help me out?

-MLF- edited this message on 04/18/2009 4:46PM

-MLF-

Avatar: 83146 Sun Jan 18 18:56:12 -0500 2009
6

Level 60 Hacker

“Cracking Addict”

I don’t see why the Bannable Offenses page was reverted, was there something missing?

-MLF- edited this message on 04/18/2009 4:46PM

ChilePepino

Avatar: 101005 2010-01-24 16:17:40 -0500
5

[Full of SbumSS]

Level 35 Permanoob

Well, spf357 really rocks.

3) NO NAKED OR HIGHLY SEXUALIZED PHOTOS/ILLUSTRATIONS OF UNDERAGE CHILDREN.

They don’t need to be “highly” sexualized.

-MLF-

Avatar: 83146 Sun Jan 18 18:56:12 -0500 2009
6

Level 60 Hacker

“Cracking Addict”

ChilePepino Posted:

3) NO NAKED OR HIGHLY SEXUALIZED PHOTOS/ILLUSTRATIONS OF UNDERAGE CHILDREN.

They don’t need to be “highly” sexualized.

Actually yes, a sexualized picture, would just be one endowed with sexual characteristics, and it’s my understanding that if the picture is not “highly” sexualized, it is still acceptable.

CaptainDDL

Avatar: 34340 2009-09-30 16:41:31 -0400
24

[Brainfreeze]

Level 63 Troll

Fran's Beautiful Lover XOXOXOXOXO

MeatLoafFan Posted:

Actually yes, a sexualized picture, would just be one endowed with sexual characteristics, and it’s my understanding that if the picture is not “highly” sexualized, it is still acceptable.

http://forumwarz.com/discussions/view/32643-cp-vs-cp

-MLF-

Avatar: 83146 Sun Jan 18 18:56:12 -0500 2009
6

Level 60 Hacker

“Cracking Addict”

MeatLoafFan Posted:

it’s my understanding

Keep in mind, I just copy-pasted from the forum.

Internet Delay Chat
Have fun playing!
To chat with other players, you must Join Forumwarz or Log In now!