You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.
You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.
- « previous
- 1
- 2
- « next
An INCIT fix. | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
INCIT milestone peens would possibly offset a higher min submissions requirement. |
||||||
Posted On: 07/22/2009 2:28AM | View Fie's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Fie Posted:
Good Idea. Add INCIT Peens and it will flood. Only problem I see with that is Klan/Trade voting to get the Peens. |
||||||
Posted On: 07/22/2009 2:41AM | View Skyman747's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Mod Edit: embedded shock removed
UNBAN CRINKZPIPE Fzero edited this message on 07/23/2009 11:21PM |
||||||
Posted On: 07/22/2009 4:48PM | View Fzero's Profile | # | ||||||
Skyman747 Posted:
That already happens enough to get the two INCIT peens we have now (Creative Inputter, High in Dietary Fiber). It’s not really something that can be stopped. Putting people in separate brackets makes it slightly harder though (if two people land in the same bracket, then they can’t always vote for each other.) |
|||||||
Posted On: 08/06/2009 12:07PM | View ghax's Profile | # | ||||||
|
If you guys really want to do something about klan voting or trade voting in incit, just make it show who voted for what in the result screen. if you start to see 2 or more people, only voting for each other, you can have some actual prove of klan voting. |
||||||
Posted On: 08/06/2009 12:41PM | View EVECHARM's Profile | # | ||||||
|
EVECHARM Posted:
Amazingly good common sense solution. |
||||||
Posted On: 08/06/2009 1:03PM | View Vageena Davis's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Fie: Great idea. But add a third problem to the list of problems with INCIT: Klan voting
EVECHARM: Also a great idea.
I suggest CZ implement this on a trial basis |
||||||
Posted On: 08/06/2009 3:44PM | View Daniel Plainview...'s Profile | # | ||||||
|
EVECHARM Posted:
That would also mean we could finally see exactly who it was that dumpvoted the ****ty piece of **** submission into the winning position. I wholeheartedly endorse this idea and promise to stop dumpvoting ****ty subs as soon as it is implemented. man-man edited this message on 08/07/2009 1:54PM |
||||||
Posted On: 08/07/2009 1:54PM | View man-man's Profile | # | ||||||
|
I do see one problem. Sometimes not everyone will agree that a ****ty submission is ****ty. You might say that that guy was dumpvoting while he’s wondering what the fuss is about because he voted for what genuinely thought was the best sub.
To illustrate this, if you ask the current INCIT userbase, 9 out of 10 will tell you THIS is funny: Daniel Plainview edited this message on 08/07/2009 2:17PM |
||||||
Posted On: 08/07/2009 2:15PM | View Daniel Plainview...'s Profile | # | ||||||
|
You can illustrate the same with the fact that the same submission can be found on page 2, and page 7493 of the Hall of ****. I mean… if you ignore the part where that’s almost certainly because one got downvoted for being a ripoff of an already popular one.
Ignoring that, it illustrates the point perfectly. Log in to see images! |
||||||
Posted On: 08/07/2009 3:29PM | View man-man's Profile | # | ||||||
- « previous
- 1
- 2
- « next