was Posted:

If this is true isn’t it toxx worthy?

It was an honest mistake.

StrayNeko Posted:

There isn’t even a last post when they get the epeen anymore getting a prize! just 2 winners getting 11. the contest has been tampered with so much there is no way it should go on.

I already explained that there aren’t 2 prizes of 11; are you just here to get generichaxor banned?

Seems toxx-worthy to me.

Perhaps someone should attempt to get Hobart banned for drastically reducing the scope of his own contest while it was already underway. His contest originally didn’t have that clause about being null and void if generichaxor gets a leaderboard E-Peen.

zagerblag Posted:

His contest originally didn’t have that clause about being null and void if generichaxor gets a leaderboard E-Peen.

Oleg Mordashov Posted:

It is not relevant what he meant to say and it is not relevant what somebody understood: What matters is what should have been understood from an objective point of view.

Oleg Mordashov Posted:

Don’t you even know the most basic judiciary principles? It is not relevant what he meant to say and it is not relevant what somebody understood: What matters is what should have been understood from an objective point of view. And if an impartial observer would think that 11 BP would be given away twice, this is a clear case of toxx.

I don’t even see why things need to be so complicated. It is obvious that the terms of the contest were changed multiple times without proper notification (and not only to the better), so the contest is clearly not valid anymore. I don’t see a way to continue it now. Log in to see images!

The OP never said anything to the effect that 11 BPs each would be given to 2 people. 1 of generichaxor’s posts in the contest could have been misinterpreted that way, but that’s it. It’s already obvious that you have a vendetta against generichaxor; stop pretending to be the impartial observer you’re talking about. The contest has only been supplemented, never reduced.

Oleg Mordashov Posted:

zagerblag Posted:

His contest originally didn’t have that clause about being null and void if generichaxor gets a leaderboard E-Peen.

Oleg Mordashov Posted:

It is not relevant what he meant to say and it is not relevant what somebody understood: What matters is what should have been understood from an objective point of view.

So are you supporting banning Hobart, or are you claiming that Hobart’s slip was different from generichaxor’s?

zagerblag Posted:

generichaxor doesn’t seem to be around right now. Hopefully when (s)he gets back, (s)he’ll clarify this.

(S)He posted on the first page. Are you being used as a proxy?

DarkDespair5 Posted:

Given Oleg’s previous history of bumault against Generichaxor, I say he’s not an impartial observer…

Your saying gene’s clan are impartial observers?

was Posted:

(S)He posted on the first page. Are you being used as a proxy?

His/her most recent post was on 3:57PM server time. I am not serving as a proxy; why would I? generichaxor doesn’t have a ban to cirgreat timesvent or anything like that.