Forumwarz is the first "Massively Single-Player" online RPG completely built around Internet culture.

You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.

You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.

Log in or Learn about Forumwarz

Civil Discussion
Switch to Role-Playing Civil Discussion
Interface Request for new "Enemies" Tab.

swine

Avatar: 10221 2011-10-31 21:15:57 -0400
28

[Harem and Sushi Bar]

Level 69 Troll

I congratulate you in recognising my superiority and choosing me to be your love pig!

Would it be possible to add a “Bans” tab under “Enemies”? It seems that a lot of people like to add (User was banned for X) in the Typical and Angry replies. For stylistic reasons, it might be neat to have a few to cycle through and randomly append to posts based on the forums general theme. Just a thought.

Mansex

Avatar: Ron Paul

[LOL I SUCK]

Level 7 Troll

“Jerk Chicken”

i actually like this idea

Patently Chi-
ll Prestidig-
itator

Avatar: 128746 2011-10-09 04:24:59 -0400
8

[love is a dog from-
hell
]

Level 69 Troll

Celerysteve is incredible... he is just so... so incredible.

Upvoted.

WoweeZowee

Avatar: Old Man and Crying Baby
12

Level 35 Emo Kid

“Cutty Cutterson”

nice idea

Shii

Avatar: 23167 2010-01-24 16:31:18 -0500
27

[Phantasmagoric Spl-
endor
]

Level 35 Emo Kid

I haven't seen a bad idea that I didn't like.

Eh.

I dunno.

I frequently put one or two creative ban messages in my Typical Posts, and usually, only about 1 ban message is good enough to get into the actual forum.

Generally there’s not much more than about 1 good ban message to even be done.

Bigandtasty

Avatar: 67579 Sat Jan 17 15:30:20 -0500 2009
12

[Grey Goose Mafiosi]

Level 35 Emo Kid

“Cutty Cutterson”

eh, i’ve found that “USER WAS BANNED FOR X” posts usually have a good chance of getting in, and sometimes similar ban messages will both get in (see Engrish Ressons typical posts)

Good idea in theory but I don’t know how hard it would be to implement and align the banned avatars/typical posts/angry replies together

Inertia

Avatar: 60995 Fri Apr 03 12:59:05 -0400 2009
34

[Shii is gay]

Level 35 Troll

also wow i have no male reproductive organ

brb submitting a “user was banned for this post” entry

Call Me Diego

Avatar: 41721 2010-01-14 23:10:10 -0500
50

[Good Omens]

Level 69 Emo Kid

Boo!

I find the “User banned” to be lazy and mostly idiotic.

Fortunato

Avatar: 72902 2010-02-03 18:45:17 -0500
32

[Grey Goose Mafiosi]

Level 51 Troll

ZOMBIE CANNONBALL OF GORE

The Wandering Hypocrite Posted:

I find the “User banned” to be lazy and mostly idiotic.

Yep. Gimmicky subs like “user banned” are only just behind the subs that use the img or youtube tag on my list of subs that should be eliminated completely.

zagerblag

Avatar: 102042 Wed Jun 03 22:55:29 -0400 2009
16

[Board of Directors]

Level 35 Hacker

asdf

At first, I thought this was going to be about a proposed ability to “Enemy” people instead of just “Friend”ing them. There are people I want to Enemy. Are there actually any social networks or multiplayer games that let you Enemy people?

Internet Delay Chat
Have fun playing!
To chat with other players, you must Join Forumwarz or Log In now!