Buy Brownie Points
Forumwarz is the first "Massively Single-Player" online RPG completely built around Internet culture.

You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.

You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.

Log in or Learn about Forumwarz

Civil Discussion
Switch to Role-Playing Civil Discussion
Ugly No Trolling: Poll about Dragons

Auser

Avatar: 89481 Thu Feb 26 14:58:28 -0500 2009
19

[Grey Goose Mafiosi]

Level 35 Troll

Just south of sanity

Inertia Posted:

Why did you have to put “No Trolling” in the title. it’s not cool.

It does seem a bit odd considering were in Game Discussion where you can’t troll at all Log in to see images!

Wylin

Avatar: 19712 Thu Mar 26 21:15:20 -0400 2009
35

[Brainfreeze]

Level 69 Troll

Causing Jealousy On The Internet On A Daily Basis.

Auser Posted:

It does seem a bit odd considering were in Game Discussion where you can’t troll at all Log in to see images!

I responded to this in the 3rd post on page 2.

Possibly a C-
abbage

Avatar: 76887 Fri Oct 24 03:39:44 -0400 2008
9

[Leafy Green Vegeta-
bles
]

Level 35 Hacker

Herbaceous, biennial, dicotyledonous , and flowering.

Wylin Posted:

I kinda like the idea of restricting dragons to signatures, then you can’t go overboard with them huh? Maybe that’s too restrictive?

I think it is too restrictive, especially considering that the one dragon thread that has never annoyed anybody ever is the “dragcave.net party” in Meme Factory. Which is just the dragon posters saying “hey look at my dragons” and “help, I need clicks”, and nobody who isn’t interested in that sort of thing goes there.

If you restricted them to sigs, you’d be eliminating what is clearly the most successful (and least annoying) of all dragon threads, since meme factory is not RP and so there aren’t any sigs there.

quangntenemy

Avatar: 14557 2011-10-31 11:07:55 -0400
59

[WeChall]

Level 69 Troll

:ronpaul: :****ing sucks:

Wylin Posted:

I kinda like the idea of restricting dragons to signatures, then you can’t go overboard with them huh? Maybe that’s too restrictive?

Stop making up rules just because you’re bumhurt.

Wylin

Avatar: 19712 Thu Mar 26 21:15:20 -0400 2009
35

[Brainfreeze]

Level 69 Troll

Causing Jealousy On The Internet On A Daily Basis.

quangntenemy Posted:

Stop making up rules just because you’re bumhurt.

Um, if you followed what I’ve been saying you’d know my bum is fine. There are people who seem to be offended by dragons (Raepdog for example) and I just wanted to see what people thought. I’m also pretty sure I don’t work for Crotch Zombie, or make rules. Please stop trolling in the thread that is in a no trolling forum and has no trolling right in the title.

quangntenemy

Avatar: 14557 2011-10-31 11:07:55 -0400
59

[WeChall]

Level 69 Troll

:ronpaul: :****ing sucks:

Wylin Posted:

Um, if you followed what I’ve been saying you’d know my bum is fine. There are people who seem to be offended by dragons (Raepdog for example) and I just wanted to see what people thought. I’m also pretty sure I don’t work for Crotch Zombie, or make rules. Please stop trolling in the thread that is in a no trolling forum and has no trolling right in the title.

If you’re not bumhurt then why are you driving the topic against dragons while the real problem that CZ’s been fixing is image spamming?

Wylin

Avatar: 19712 Thu Mar 26 21:15:20 -0400 2009
35

[Brainfreeze]

Level 69 Troll

Causing Jealousy On The Internet On A Daily Basis.

quangntenemy Posted:

If you’re not bumhurt then why are you driving the topic against dragons while the real problem that CZ’s been fixing is image spamming?

I personally voted that I don’t care if they are posted. This thread is showing that most people don’t care about them either. If you look at the second post, Fingerz summed up what the other people might think. Thread is not anti-dragons, it’s asking how many people are bumhurt by them. And, yes it does stem from Desdipheonix’s image spamming that she did because she was bumhurt about dragons, but the poll is showing that she was in the minority.

Possibly a C-
abbage

Avatar: 76887 Fri Oct 24 03:39:44 -0400 2008
9

[Leafy Green Vegeta-
bles
]

Level 35 Hacker

Herbaceous, biennial, dicotyledonous , and flowering.

quangntenemy Posted:

If you’re not bumhurt then why are you driving the topic against dragons while the real problem that CZ’s been fixing is image spamming?

There is a weird phenomenon that there are some people who get very bent out of shape whenever anybody posts dragons, but don’t react the same way to gratuitous spamming of gay porn, emus, pictures of feet, whatever. This is strange to me, but it seems a reasonable thing to discuss at least.

quangntenemy

Avatar: 14557 2011-10-31 11:07:55 -0400
59

[WeChall]

Level 69 Troll

:ronpaul: :****ing sucks:

Wylin Posted:

I personally voted that I don’t care if they are posted. This thread is showing that most people don’t care about them either. If you look at the second post, Fingerz summed up what the other people might think. Thread is not anti-dragons, it’s asking how many people are bumhurt by them. And, yes it does stem from Desdipheonix’s image spamming that she did because she was bumhurt about dragons, but the poll is showing that she was in the minority.

Okay sorry man I just read the whole thread again and found out the idea was not originally yours but OrsonScottCard’s so all my questions are for him.

I just don’t like it when someone spammed dragons and instead of fighting against spamming some people are blaming everything against dragons.

Internet Delay Chat
Have fun playing!
To chat with other players, you must Join Forumwarz or Log In now!