You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.
You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.
LEAVINF FIREFOX RUNNING IS AWESOME | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ESPECIALLY When you leave the house for hours and come back to read IDC
HitThisIfYouLikeHerpes: bronnih: haven’t seen you in a while, how’ve you been? 3:09PM bronnih: HitThisIfYouLikeHerpes: meh, better, but i’m angry with falcon 3:09PM FalCoN: bronnih: hey 3:10PM FalCoN: bronnih: why? 3:10PM HitThisIfYouLikeHerpes: bronnih: did he post your nudes? 3:10PM Nicco: http://www.xhaven.net/poetkurbs/Clouds.jpg 3:10PM HitThisIfYouLikeHerpes: link 3:10PM bronnih: FalCoN: NSFW? me? what? yes? i? have? seen? the? thread? you? barstool! 3:10PM FalCoN: lol I didn’t 3:10PM FalCoN: haha 3:10PM FalCoN: I just posted a link to that photobucket image 3:10PM bronnih: FalCoN: and there isn’t even a picture? 3:10PM FalCoN: yeah 3:11PM bronnih: FalCoN: what photobucket image? 3:11PM HitThisIfYouLikeHerpes: link me to photobucket image! 3:11PM FalCoN: well, the image that there is no image 3:11PM bronnih: FalCoN: you fabulous person! i thought youd ratted me out 3:11PM FalCoN: 3:11PM FalCoN: imo it’s a good thread 3:11PM HitThisIfYouLikeHerpes: bronnih is really a man? 3:11PM FalCoN: many peopel click it. 3:11PM FalCoN: *people 3:11PM FalCoN: and they all get disappointed. 3:12PM FalCoN: that’s how a good thread should look like. 3:12PM FalCoN: <—- good poster 3:12PM FalCoN: 3:12PM bronnih: FalCoN: tubsweeite is angry with you because he thinks i am a pure and innocent child 3:12PM bronnih: HitThisIfYouLikeHerpes: i’m not a ****ing man! 3:12PM HitThisIfYouLikeHerpes: bronnih: mammary glands or you are a man 3:13PM bronnih: HitThisIfYouLikeHerpes: mammary glands=jail for you 3:13PM FalCoN: bronnih: TUBSWEETIE is right imo 3:13PM FalCoN: you are a pure and innocent (yet dangerous!) child 3:13PM HitThisIfYouLikeHerpes: bronnih: me = don’t care 3:13PM bronnih: FalCoN: i’m not pure and innocent! 3:14PM FalCoN: I know 3:14PM bronnih: FalCoN: 3:14PM FalCoN: but TUBSWEETIE doesn’t 3:14PM bronnih: FalCoN: or wait. did he call you an bumhole beccause you didn’t post a nude of me? 3:15PM FalCoN: bronnih: I won’t tell… I leave this up to you 3:15PM FalCoN: ask him 3:15PM bronnih: FalCoN: i might, 3:16PM handofg0d: http://www.forumwarz.com/spoilers/wiki/Handofg0d 3:16PM handofg0d: lol 3:16PM FalCoN: 3:16PM bronnih: tubsweetie is a lovely boy 3:16PM FalCoN: tell him 3:17PM handofg0d: Nicco: even bigger 3:18PM bronnih: FalCoN: maybe i shall// although i think he wanted to see my mammary glands 3:18PM FalCoN: bronnih: even if he did, I still think that he’s a lovely boy 3:19PM Nicco: http://img162.imageshack.us/img162/6348/tsbjm7.png 3:19PM Nicco: 3:19PM FalCoN: 3:19PM bronnih: FalCoN: i can’t believe he’s a virgin! 3:19PM handofg0d: Nicco: I’m uploading one now 3:19PM FalCoN: bronnih: how was your day? 3:19PM FalCoN: bronnih: Why? 3:19PM handofg0d: that’s 5674 x 8000 3:20PM handofg0d: 6.7mb 3:20PM handofg0d: lol 3:20PM bronnih: FalCoN: lame and school-filled, 3:20PM FalCoN: expected answer 3:20PM bronnih: FalCoN: and because he is nice and talented and not at all bad looking 3:20PM FalCoN: sounds logical to me 3:20PM FalCoN: ... talented at what? 3:20PM bronnih: FalCoN: he made an engine! 3:21PM FalCoN: indeed. 3:21PM FalCoN: I think you should visit Canada and have sex with him 3:21PM bronnih: FalCoN: sounds like a plan, i like canada 3:22PM FalCoN: Canada has too many trees for my taste 3:22PM bronnih: FalCoN: i’m good with trees, i have a badge that says “i trees” Log in to see images! Log in to see images! |
||||||
Posted On: 01/20/2009 5:46PM | View Fingerz's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Wow. I caught a little of that convo as it was going on; now I wish I’d stayed in there. Log in to see images! |
||||||
Posted On: 01/20/2009 5:49PM | View OrsonScottCard's Profile | # | ||||||
|
ya memory leaks own Log in to see images! |
||||||
Posted On: 01/20/2009 5:49PM | View 1337xxxxxxxxxlol...'s Profile | # | ||||||
|
oppps didn’t really read that chat logs… Log in to see images! |
||||||
Posted On: 01/20/2009 5:50PM | View 1337xxxxxxxxxlol...'s Profile | # | ||||||
|
tl;dr?
Bronnih wants Tubsweetie’s male reproductive organ Log in to see images! Log in to see images! Log in to see images! |
||||||
Posted On: 01/20/2009 5:53PM | View Fingerz's Profile | # | ||||||
Log in to see images! Log in to see images! |
|||||||
Posted On: 01/20/2009 5:55PM | View -XI-'s Profile | # | ||||||
|
Raepdog just stepping in. Log in to see images! Log in to see images! |
||||||
Posted On: 01/20/2009 5:59PM | View Raepdog's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Fingerz Posted: Hobart Bliggity Posted: |
||||||
Posted On: 01/21/2009 12:36PM | View TUBSWEETIE's Profile | # | ||||||
|
-XI- Posted:
Log in to see images! |
||||||
Posted On: 01/21/2009 12:37PM | View Nicco's Profile | # | ||||||
|
TUBSWEETIE Posted: Log in to see images! Log in to see images! |
||||||
Posted On: 01/21/2009 12:38PM | View Fingerz's Profile | # | ||||||
|
for the record i approve of falcon’s plan Hobart Bliggity Posted: |
||||||
Posted On: 01/21/2009 12:40PM | View TUBSWEETIE's Profile | # | ||||||
|
tl;dc except for what h0g & nicco were posting
which is awesome |
||||||
Posted On: 01/21/2009 2:36PM | View Something_Witty's Profile | # | ||||||
|
You know what’s more awesome?
Firefox within Firefox. |
||||||
Posted On: 01/21/2009 6:49PM | View dartagnan59's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Leaving Firefox running with iMacros and a billion flip-flops is p cool too. Log in to see images! |
||||||
Posted On: 01/21/2009 6:51PM | View Johnny Mac's Profile | # | ||||||
I was chatting with a colleague yesterday as we were both examining a site we’re developing. I wss experiencing fairly frequent response lag while he was seeing only zippy performance. I thought I’d restart Firefox to see if that made any difference. Wow, did it!
Over the past few weeks, I’ve been noticing that Firefox does seem to get sluggish if I leave it on for a day or more. My colleague says he regularly quits and restarts FF 2-4 times each day. He’s on Windows while I, of course, run a Mac life. I did some research and conventional wisdom at least seems to be that FF does not have what is called a “memory leak”, a fairly serious programming-related problem. Rather, it apparently just keeps stuffing recent pages into its memory for fast retrieval of frequently or recently visited sites. Eventually, it gets enough of these stored in RAM that it hurts its own performance.
I was unable to find any recommendations as to how big I ought to set that cache to avoid sluggish response while keeping maximum pages in RAM for quick retrieval. It is presently set at 50MB.
Next time my browser experience feels slow, I’ll try clearing cache rather than restarting the browser and see if I get a similar improvement. If you have any thoughts on this subject, please join my blog community and post a comment to this post or email me at dan at danshafer dot com. I was chatting with a colleague yesterday as we were both examining a site we’re developing. I wss experiencing fairly frequent response lag while he was seeing only zippy performance. I thought I’d restart Firefox to see if that made any difference. Wow, did it!
Over the past few weeks, I’ve been noticing that Firefox does seem to get sluggish if I leave it on for a day or more. My colleague says he regularly quits and restarts FF 2-4 times each day. He’s on Windows while I, of course, run a Mac life. I did some research and conventional wisdom at least seems to be that FF does not have what is called a “memory leak”, a fairly serious programming-related problem. Rather, it apparently just keeps stuffing recent pages into its memory for fast retrieval of frequently or recently visited sites. Eventually, it gets enough of these stored in RAM that it hurts its own performance.
I was unable to find any recommendations as to how big I ought to set that cache to avoid sluggish response while keeping maximum pages in RAM for quick retrieval. It is presently set at 50MB.
Next time my browser experience feels slow, I’ll try clearing cache rather than restarting the browser and see if I get a similar improvement. If you have any thoughts on this subject, please join my blog community and post a comment to this post or email me at dan at danshafer dot com. I was chatting with a colleague yesterday as we were both examining a site we’re developing. I wss experiencing fairly frequent response lag while he was seeing only zippy performance. I thought I’d restart Firefox to see if that made any difference. Wow, did it!
Over the past few weeks, I’ve been noticing that Firefox does seem to get sluggish if I leave it on for a day or more. My colleague says he regularly quits and restarts FF 2-4 times each day. He’s on Windows while I, of course, run a Mac life. I did some research and conventional wisdom at least seems to be that FF does not have what is called a “memory leak”, a fairly serious programming-related problem. Rather, it apparently just keeps stuffing recent pages into its memory for fast retrieval of frequently or recently visited sites. Eventually, it gets enough of these stored in RAM that it hurts its own performance.
I was unable to find any recommendations as to how big I ought to set that cache to avoid sluggish response while keeping maximum pages in RAM for quick retrieval. It is presently set at 50MB.
Next time my browser experience feels slow, I’ll try clearing cache rather than restarting the browser and see if I get a similar improvement. If you have any thoughts on this subject, please join my blog community and post a comment to this post or email me at dan at danshafer dot com. I was chatting with a colleague yesterday as we were both examining a site we’re developing. I wss experiencing fairly frequent response lag while he was seeing only zippy performance. I thought I’d restart Firefox to see if that made any difference. Wow, did it!
Over the past few weeks, I’ve been noticing that Firefox does seem to get sluggish if I leave it on for a day or more. My colleague says he regularly quits and restarts FF 2-4 times each day. He’s on Windows while I, of course, run a Mac life. I did some research and conventional wisdom at least seems to be that FF does not have what is called a “memory leak”, a fairly serious programming-related problem. Rather, it apparently just keeps stuffing recent pages into its memory for fast retrieval of frequently or recently visited sites. Eventually, it gets enough of these stored in RAM that it hurts its own performance.
I was unable to find any recommendations as to how big I ought to set that cache to avoid sluggish response while keeping maximum pages in RAM for quick retrieval. It is presently set at 50MB.
Next time my browser experience feels slow, I’ll try clearing cache rather than restarting the browser and see if I get a similar improvement. If you have any thoughts on this subject, please join my blog community and post a comment to this post or email me at dan at danshafer dot com. I was chatting with a colleague yesterday as we were both examining a site we’re developing. I wss experiencing fairly frequent response lag while he was seeing only zippy performance. I thought I’d restart Firefox to see if that made any difference. Wow, did it!
Over the past few weeks, I’ve been noticing that Firefox does seem to get sluggish if I leave it on for a day or more. My colleague says he regularly quits and restarts FF 2-4 times each day. He’s on Windows while I, of course, run a Mac life. I did some research and conventional wisdom at least seems to be that FF does not have what is called a “memory leak”, a fairly serious programming-related problem. Rather, it apparently just keeps stuffing recent pages into its memory for fast retrieval of frequently or recently visited sites. Eventually, it gets enough of these stored in RAM that it hurts its own performance.
I was unable to find any recommendations as to how big I ought to set that cache to avoid sluggish response while keeping maximum pages in RAM for quick retrieval. It is presently set at 50MB.
Next time my browser experience feels slow, I’ll try clearing cache rather than restarting the browser and see if I get a similar improvement. If you have any thoughts on this subject, please join my blog community and post a comment to this post or email me at dan at danshafer dot com. I was chatting with a colleague yesterday as we were both examining a site we’re developing. I wss experiencing fairly frequent response lag while he was seeing only zippy performance. I thought I’d restart Firefox to see if that made any difference. Wow, did it!
Over the past few weeks, I’ve been noticing that Firefox does seem to get sluggish if I leave it on for a day or more. My colleague says he regularly quits and restarts FF 2-4 times each day. He’s on Windows while I, of course, run a Mac life. I did some research and conventional wisdom at least seems to be that FF does not have what is called a “memory leak”, a fairly serious programming-related problem. Rather, it apparently just keeps stuffing recent pages into its memory for fast retrieval of frequently or recently visited sites. Eventually, it gets enough of these stored in RAM that it hurts its own performance.
I was unable to find any recommendations as to how big I ought to set that cache to avoid sluggish response while keeping maximum pages in RAM for quick retrieval. It is presently set at 50MB.
Next time my browser experience feels slow, I’ll try clearing cache rather than restarting the browser and see if I get a similar improvement. If you have any thoughts on this subject, please join my blog community and post a comment to this post or email me at dan at danshafer dot com. I was chatting with a colleague yesterday as we were both examining a site we’re developing. I wss experiencing fairly frequent response lag while he was seeing only zippy performance. I thought I’d restart Firefox to see if that made any difference. Wow, did it!
Over the past few weeks, I’ve been noticing that Firefox does seem to get sluggish if I leave it on for a day or more. My colleague says he regularly quits and restarts FF 2-4 times each day. He’s on Windows while I, of course, run a Mac life. I did some research and conventional wisdom at least seems to be that FF does not have what is called a “memory leak”, a fairly serious programming-related problem. Rather, it apparently just keeps stuffing recent pages into its memory for fast retrieval of frequently or recently visited sites. Eventually, it gets enough of these stored in RAM that it hurts its own performance.
I was unable to find any recommendations as to how big I ought to set that cache to avoid sluggish response while keeping maximum pages in RAM for quick retrieval. It is presently set at 50MB.
Next time my browser experience feels slow, I’ll try clearing cache rather than restarting the browser and see if I get a similar improvement. If you have any thoughts on this subject, please join my blog community and post a comment to this post or email me at dan at danshafer dot com. I was chatting with a colleague yesterday as we were both examining a site we’re developing. I wss experiencing fairly frequent response lag while he was seeing only zippy performance. I thought I’d restart Firefox to see if that made any difference. Wow, did it!
Over the past few weeks, I’ve been noticing that Firefox does seem to get sluggish if I leave it on for a day or more. My colleague says he regularly quits and restarts FF 2-4 times each day. He’s on Windows while I, of course, run a Mac life. I did some research and conventional wisdom at least seems to be that FF does not have what is called a “memory leak”, a fairly serious programming-related problem. Rather, it apparently just keeps stuffing recent pages into its memory for fast retrieval of frequently or recently visited sites. Eventually, it gets enough of these stored in RAM that it hurts its own performance.
I was unable to find any recommendations as to how big I ought to set that cache to avoid sluggish response while keeping maximum pages in RAM for quick retrieval. It is presently set at 50MB.
Next time my browser experience feels slow, I’ll try clearing cache rather than restarting the browser and see if I get a similar improvement. If you have any thoughts on this subject, please join my blog community and post a comment to this post or email me at dan at danshafer dot com. I was chatting with a colleague yesterday as we were both examining a site we’re developing. I wss experiencing fairly frequent response lag while he was seeing only zippy performance. I thought I’d restart Firefox to see if that made any difference. Wow, did it!
Over the past few weeks, I’ve been noticing that Firefox does seem to get sluggish if I leave it on for a day or more. My colleague says he regularly quits and restarts FF 2-4 times each day. He’s on Windows while I, of course, run a Mac life. I did some research and conventional wisdom at least seems to be that FF does not have what is called a “memory leak”, a fairly serious programming-related problem. Rather, it apparently just keeps stuffing recent pages into its memory for fast retrieval of frequently or recently visited sites. Eventually, it gets enough of these stored in RAM that it hurts its own performance.
I was unable to find any recommendations as to how big I ought to set that cache to avoid sluggish response while keeping maximum pages in RAM for quick retrieval. It is presently set at 50MB.
Next time my browser experience feels slow, I’ll try clearing cache rather than restarting the browser and see if I get a similar improvement. If you have any thoughts on this subject, please join my blog community and post a comment to this post or email me at dan at danshafer dot com. I was chatting with a colleague yesterday as we were both examining a site we’re developing. I wss experiencing fairly frequent response lag while he was seeing only zippy performance. I thought I’d restart Firefox to see if that made any difference. Wow, did it!
Over the past few weeks, I’ve been noticing that Firefox does seem to get sluggish if I leave it on for a day or more. My colleague says he regularly quits and restarts FF 2-4 times each day. He’s on Windows while I, of course, run a Mac life. I did some research and conventional wisdom at least seems to be that FF does not have what is called a “memory leak”, a fairly serious programming-related problem. Rather, it apparently just keeps stuffing recent pages into its memory for fast retrieval of frequently or recently visited sites. Eventually, it gets enough of these stored in RAM that it hurts its own performance.
I was unable to find any recommendations as to how big I ought to set that cache to avoid sluggish response while keeping maximum pages in RAM for quick retrieval. It is presently set at 50MB.
Next time my browser experience feels slow, I’ll try clearing cache rather than restarting the browser and see if I get a similar improvement. If you have any thoughts on this subject, please join my blog community and post a comment to this post or email me at dan at danshafer dot com. I was chatting with a colleague yesterday as we were both examining a site we’re developing. I wss experiencing fairly frequent response lag while he was seeing only zippy performance. I thought I’d restart Firefox to see if that made any difference. Wow, did it!
Over the past few weeks, I’ve been noticing that Firefox does seem to get sluggish if I leave it on for a day or more. My colleague says he regularly quits and restarts FF 2-4 times each day. He’s on Windows while I, of course, run a Mac life. I did some research and conventional wisdom at least seems to be that FF does not have what is called a “memory leak”, a fairly serious programming-related problem. Rather, it apparently just keeps stuffing recent pages into its memory for fast retrieval of frequently or recently visited sites. Eventually, it gets enough of these stored in RAM that it hurts its own performance.
I was unable to find any recommendations as to how big I ought to set that cache to avoid sluggish response while keeping maximum pages in RAM for quick retrieval. It is presently set at 50MB.
Next time my browser experience feels slow, I’ll try clearing cache rather than restarting the browser and see if I get a similar improvement. If you have any thoughts on this subject, please join my blog community and post a comment to this post or email me at dan at danshafer dot com. I was chatting with a colleague yesterday as we were both examining a site we’re developing. I wss experiencing fairly frequent response lag while he was seeing only zippy performance. I thought I’d restart Firefox to see if that made any difference. Wow, did it!
Over the past few weeks, I’ve been noticing that Firefox does seem to get sluggish if I leave it on for a day or more. My colleague says he regularly quits and restarts FF 2-4 times each day. He’s on Windows while I, of course, run a Mac life. I did some research and conventional wisdom at least seems to be that FF does not have what is called a “memory leak”, a fairly serious programming-related problem. Rather, it apparently just keeps stuffing recent pages into its memory for fast retrieval of frequently or recently visited sites. Eventually, it gets enough of these stored in RAM that it hurts its own performance.
I was unable to find any recommendations as to how big I ought to set that cache to avoid sluggish response while keeping maximum pages in RAM for quick retrieval. It is presently set at 50MB.
Next time my browser experience feels slow, I’ll try clearing cache rather than restarting the browser and see if I get a similar improvement. If you have any thoughts on this subject, please join my blog community and post a comment to this post or email me at dan at danshafer dot com. |
|||||||
Posted On: 01/21/2009 6:56PM | View SHODAN's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Johnny Mac Posted:
YES!
Log in to see images! Log in to see images! Log in to see images! |
||||||
Posted On: 01/21/2009 9:15PM | View Fingerz's Profile | # | ||||||
|
Log in to see images! |
||||||
Posted On: 01/21/2009 9:19PM | View Bandaney's Profile | # | ||||||
|
*bump* Log in to see images! Log in to see images! |
||||||
Posted On: 05/29/2009 10:46PM | View Fingerz's Profile | # | ||||||