Buy Brownie Points
Forumwarz is the first "Massively Single-Player" online RPG completely built around Internet culture.

You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.

You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.

Log in or Learn about Forumwarz

Role Playing
Switch to Civil Discussion Role-Playing
Sex LEAVINF FIREFOX RUNNING IS AWESOME

Fingerz

Avatar: 22863 2010-11-15 01:15:51 -0500
16

[7 VIBRATING DOLDOES]

Level 35 Emo Kid

A neverhasbeen

ESPECIALLY When you leave the house for hours and come back to read IDC

HitThisIfYouLikeHerpes: bronnih: haven’t seen you in a while, how’ve you been?

3:09PM

bronnih: HitThisIfYouLikeHerpes: meh, better, but i’m angry with falcon

3:09PM

FalCoN: bronnih: hey

3:10PM

FalCoN: bronnih: why?

3:10PM

HitThisIfYouLikeHerpes: bronnih: did he post your nudes?

3:10PM

Nicco: http://www.xhaven.net/poetkurbs/Clouds.jpg

3:10PM

HitThisIfYouLikeHerpes: link

3:10PM

bronnih: FalCoN: NSFW? me? what? yes? i? have? seen? the? thread? you? barstool!

3:10PM

FalCoN: lol I didn’t

3:10PM

FalCoN: haha

3:10PM

FalCoN: I just posted a link to that photobucket image

3:10PM

bronnih: FalCoN: and there isn’t even a picture?

3:10PM

FalCoN: yeah

3:11PM

bronnih: FalCoN: what photobucket image?

3:11PM

HitThisIfYouLikeHerpes: link me to photobucket image!

3:11PM

FalCoN: well, the image that there is no image

3:11PM

bronnih: FalCoN: you fabulous person! i thought youd ratted me out

3:11PM

FalCoN:

3:11PM

FalCoN: imo it’s a good thread

3:11PM

HitThisIfYouLikeHerpes: bronnih is really a man?

3:11PM

FalCoN: many peopel click it.

3:11PM

FalCoN: *people

3:11PM

FalCoN: and they all get disappointed.

3:12PM

FalCoN: that’s how a good thread should look like.

3:12PM

FalCoN: <—- good poster

3:12PM

FalCoN:

3:12PM

bronnih: FalCoN: tubsweeite is angry with you because he thinks i am a pure and innocent child

3:12PM

bronnih: HitThisIfYouLikeHerpes: i’m not a ****ing man!

3:12PM

HitThisIfYouLikeHerpes: bronnih: mammary glands or you are a man

3:13PM

bronnih: HitThisIfYouLikeHerpes: mammary glands=jail for you

3:13PM

FalCoN: bronnih: TUBSWEETIE is right imo

3:13PM

FalCoN: you are a pure and innocent (yet dangerous!) child

3:13PM

HitThisIfYouLikeHerpes: bronnih: me = don’t care

3:13PM

bronnih: FalCoN: i’m not pure and innocent!

3:14PM

FalCoN: I know

3:14PM

bronnih: FalCoN:

3:14PM

FalCoN: but TUBSWEETIE doesn’t

3:14PM

bronnih: FalCoN: or wait. did he call you an bumhole beccause you didn’t post a nude of me?

3:15PM

FalCoN: bronnih: I won’t tell… I leave this up to you

3:15PM

FalCoN: ask him

3:15PM

bronnih: FalCoN: i might,

3:16PM

handofg0d: http://www.forumwarz.com/spoilers/wiki/Handofg0d

3:16PM

handofg0d: lol

3:16PM

FalCoN:

3:16PM

bronnih: tubsweetie is a lovely boy

3:16PM

FalCoN: tell him

3:17PM

handofg0d: Nicco: even bigger

3:18PM

bronnih: FalCoN: maybe i shall// although i think he wanted to see my mammary glands

3:18PM

FalCoN: bronnih: even if he did, I still think that he’s a lovely boy

3:19PM

Nicco: http://img162.imageshack.us/img162/6348/tsbjm7.png

3:19PM

Nicco:

3:19PM

FalCoN:

3:19PM

bronnih: FalCoN: i can’t believe he’s a virgin!

3:19PM

handofg0d: Nicco: I’m uploading one now

3:19PM

FalCoN: bronnih: how was your day?

3:19PM

FalCoN: bronnih: Why?

3:19PM

handofg0d: that’s 5674 x 8000

3:20PM

handofg0d: 6.7mb

3:20PM

handofg0d: lol

3:20PM

bronnih: FalCoN: lame and school-filled,

3:20PM

FalCoN: expected answer

3:20PM

bronnih: FalCoN: and because he is nice and talented and not at all bad looking

3:20PM

FalCoN: sounds logical to me

3:20PM

FalCoN: ... talented at what?

3:20PM

bronnih: FalCoN: he made an engine!

3:21PM

FalCoN: indeed.

3:21PM

FalCoN: I think you should visit Canada and have sex with him

3:21PM

bronnih: FalCoN: sounds like a plan, i like canada

3:22PM

FalCoN: Canada has too many trees for my taste

3:22PM

bronnih: FalCoN: i’m good with trees, i have a badge that says “i trees”


Log in to see images!

Log in to see images!

OrsonScottCa-
rd

Avatar: 104768 2015-08-05 14:57:49 -0400
39

[Forumwarz Speakeasy]

Level 69 Hacker

Why do I keep coming back here

Wow. I caught a little of that convo as it was going on; now I wish I’d stayed in there.


Log in to see images!

ya memory leaks own


Log in to see images!

oppps didn’t really read that

chat logs…


Log in to see images!

Fingerz

Avatar: 22863 2010-11-15 01:15:51 -0500
16

[7 VIBRATING DOLDOES]

Level 35 Emo Kid

A neverhasbeen

tl;dr?

Bronnih wants Tubsweetie’s male reproductive organ Log in to see images!


Log in to see images!

Log in to see images!

-XI-

Avatar: 65028 2009-09-29 14:53:15 -0400
8

Level 40 Troll

THEY'RE GONNA TASTE GREAT!

Log in to see images!


Log in to see images!

Raepdog

Avatar: 57155 2011-07-31 00:44:38 -0400
9

[To Your Scattered -
Raepdogs Go
]

Level 35 Camwhore

We are foe.

Raepdog just stepping in.


      Log in to see images!

Log in to see images!

TUBSWEETIE

Avatar: 3450 2011-07-31 00:45:06 -0400
28

[And The Banned Pla-
yed On
]

Level 37 Troll

MY MEMORY IS THAT OF A SMALL GRAPE

Fingerz Posted:

tl;dr?

Bronnih wants Tubsweetie’s male reproductive organ Log in to see images!

holy **** i missed this yesterday

so that’s what they were talking about.

Log in to see images!

Fingerz Posted:

bronnih: FalCoN: and because he is nice and talented and not at all bad looking

3:20PM

FalCoN: sounds logical to me

3:20PM

FalCoN: ... talented at what?

3:20PM

bronnih: FalCoN: he made an engine!

3:21PM

FalCoN: indeed.

3:21PM

FalCoN: I think you should visit Canada and have sex with him

3:21PM

bronnih: FalCoN: sounds like a plan, i like canada

Log in to see images! TUBSWEETIE edited this message on 01/21/2009 12:38PM


Hobart Bliggity Posted:

I’m going to stop mid sentence because I just realized that forumwarz has become exactly what it started off parodying. A good number of the newer posters don’t see that we’re making fun of idiots and spammers and trolls that exist on other forums. They are the idiots and spammers and trolls we used to parody. I really can’t get past that right now but good work CZ I guess.

http://www.forumwarz.com/discussions/view_post/653647

Nicco

MODERATOR
Avatar: 24745 2011-07-31 00:34:23 -0400
51

[Harem and Sushi Bar]

Level 69 Troll

Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco

-XI- Posted:

Log in to see images!

TSB


Log in to see images!

Fingerz

Avatar: 22863 2010-11-15 01:15:51 -0500
16

[7 VIBRATING DOLDOES]

Level 35 Emo Kid

A neverhasbeen

TUBSWEETIE Posted:

holy **** i missed this yesterday

so that’s what they were talking about.

Log in to see images!

Mmmhmmm Log in to see images!


Log in to see images!

Log in to see images!

TUBSWEETIE

Avatar: 3450 2011-07-31 00:45:06 -0400
28

[And The Banned Pla-
yed On
]

Level 37 Troll

MY MEMORY IS THAT OF A SMALL GRAPE

for the record i approve of falcon’s plan


Hobart Bliggity Posted:

I’m going to stop mid sentence because I just realized that forumwarz has become exactly what it started off parodying. A good number of the newer posters don’t see that we’re making fun of idiots and spammers and trolls that exist on other forums. They are the idiots and spammers and trolls we used to parody. I really can’t get past that right now but good work CZ I guess.

http://www.forumwarz.com/discussions/view_post/653647

Something_Wi-
tty

Avatar: 32289 2010-01-24 16:35:06 -0500

[Team Shortbus]

Level 26 Permanoob

OH GOD WHAT THE **** IS THAT MY HEAD JUST GOT DECAPITATED

tl;dc except for what h0g & nicco were posting

which is awesome

dartagnan59

Avatar: Turtle Head

Level 31 Troll

“Permafail”

You know what’s more awesome?

Firefox within Firefox.

Johnny Mac

Avatar: 37704 2022-12-12 08:49:44 +0000
66

[Full of SbumSS]

Level 60 Troll

I grant you an bumhole x

Leaving Firefox running with iMacros and a billion flip-flops is p cool too.


Log in to see images!

SHODAN

Avatar: 56565 Thu Oct 16 09:19:29 -0400 2008
2

[Citadel]

Level 35 Hacker

Look at you, Hacker. A pathetic creature of meat and bone.

I was chatting with a colleague yesterday as we were both examining a site we’re developing. I wss experiencing fairly frequent response lag while he was seeing only zippy performance. I thought I’d restart Firefox to see if that made any difference. Wow, did it!

Over the past few weeks, I’ve been noticing that Firefox does seem to get sluggish if I leave it on for a day or more. My colleague says he regularly quits and restarts FF 2-4 times each day. He’s on Windows while I, of course, run a Mac life. I did some research and conventional wisdom at least seems to be that FF does not have what is called a “memory leak”, a fairly serious programming-related problem. Rather, it apparently just keeps stuffing recent pages into its memory for fast retrieval of frequently or recently visited sites. Eventually, it gets enough of these stored in RAM that it hurts its own performance.

I was unable to find any recommendations as to how big I ought to set that cache to avoid sluggish response while keeping maximum pages in RAM for quick retrieval. It is presently set at 50MB.

Next time my browser experience feels slow, I’ll try clearing cache rather than restarting the browser and see if I get a similar improvement. If you have any thoughts on this subject, please join my blog community and post a comment to this post or email me at dan at danshafer dot com.

I was chatting with a colleague yesterday as we were both examining a site we’re developing. I wss experiencing fairly frequent response lag while he was seeing only zippy performance. I thought I’d restart Firefox to see if that made any difference. Wow, did it!

Over the past few weeks, I’ve been noticing that Firefox does seem to get sluggish if I leave it on for a day or more. My colleague says he regularly quits and restarts FF 2-4 times each day. He’s on Windows while I, of course, run a Mac life. I did some research and conventional wisdom at least seems to be that FF does not have what is called a “memory leak”, a fairly serious programming-related problem. Rather, it apparently just keeps stuffing recent pages into its memory for fast retrieval of frequently or recently visited sites. Eventually, it gets enough of these stored in RAM that it hurts its own performance.

I was unable to find any recommendations as to how big I ought to set that cache to avoid sluggish response while keeping maximum pages in RAM for quick retrieval. It is presently set at 50MB.

Next time my browser experience feels slow, I’ll try clearing cache rather than restarting the browser and see if I get a similar improvement. If you have any thoughts on this subject, please join my blog community and post a comment to this post or email me at dan at danshafer dot com.

I was chatting with a colleague yesterday as we were both examining a site we’re developing. I wss experiencing fairly frequent response lag while he was seeing only zippy performance. I thought I’d restart Firefox to see if that made any difference. Wow, did it!

Over the past few weeks, I’ve been noticing that Firefox does seem to get sluggish if I leave it on for a day or more. My colleague says he regularly quits and restarts FF 2-4 times each day. He’s on Windows while I, of course, run a Mac life. I did some research and conventional wisdom at least seems to be that FF does not have what is called a “memory leak”, a fairly serious programming-related problem. Rather, it apparently just keeps stuffing recent pages into its memory for fast retrieval of frequently or recently visited sites. Eventually, it gets enough of these stored in RAM that it hurts its own performance.

I was unable to find any recommendations as to how big I ought to set that cache to avoid sluggish response while keeping maximum pages in RAM for quick retrieval. It is presently set at 50MB.

Next time my browser experience feels slow, I’ll try clearing cache rather than restarting the browser and see if I get a similar improvement. If you have any thoughts on this subject, please join my blog community and post a comment to this post or email me at dan at danshafer dot com.

I was chatting with a colleague yesterday as we were both examining a site we’re developing. I wss experiencing fairly frequent response lag while he was seeing only zippy performance. I thought I’d restart Firefox to see if that made any difference. Wow, did it!

Over the past few weeks, I’ve been noticing that Firefox does seem to get sluggish if I leave it on for a day or more. My colleague says he regularly quits and restarts FF 2-4 times each day. He’s on Windows while I, of course, run a Mac life. I did some research and conventional wisdom at least seems to be that FF does not have what is called a “memory leak”, a fairly serious programming-related problem. Rather, it apparently just keeps stuffing recent pages into its memory for fast retrieval of frequently or recently visited sites. Eventually, it gets enough of these stored in RAM that it hurts its own performance.

I was unable to find any recommendations as to how big I ought to set that cache to avoid sluggish response while keeping maximum pages in RAM for quick retrieval. It is presently set at 50MB.

Next time my browser experience feels slow, I’ll try clearing cache rather than restarting the browser and see if I get a similar improvement. If you have any thoughts on this subject, please join my blog community and post a comment to this post or email me at dan at danshafer dot com.

I was chatting with a colleague yesterday as we were both examining a site we’re developing. I wss experiencing fairly frequent response lag while he was seeing only zippy performance. I thought I’d restart Firefox to see if that made any difference. Wow, did it!

Over the past few weeks, I’ve been noticing that Firefox does seem to get sluggish if I leave it on for a day or more. My colleague says he regularly quits and restarts FF 2-4 times each day. He’s on Windows while I, of course, run a Mac life. I did some research and conventional wisdom at least seems to be that FF does not have what is called a “memory leak”, a fairly serious programming-related problem. Rather, it apparently just keeps stuffing recent pages into its memory for fast retrieval of frequently or recently visited sites. Eventually, it gets enough of these stored in RAM that it hurts its own performance.

I was unable to find any recommendations as to how big I ought to set that cache to avoid sluggish response while keeping maximum pages in RAM for quick retrieval. It is presently set at 50MB.

Next time my browser experience feels slow, I’ll try clearing cache rather than restarting the browser and see if I get a similar improvement. If you have any thoughts on this subject, please join my blog community and post a comment to this post or email me at dan at danshafer dot com.

I was chatting with a colleague yesterday as we were both examining a site we’re developing. I wss experiencing fairly frequent response lag while he was seeing only zippy performance. I thought I’d restart Firefox to see if that made any difference. Wow, did it!

Over the past few weeks, I’ve been noticing that Firefox does seem to get sluggish if I leave it on for a day or more. My colleague says he regularly quits and restarts FF 2-4 times each day. He’s on Windows while I, of course, run a Mac life. I did some research and conventional wisdom at least seems to be that FF does not have what is called a “memory leak”, a fairly serious programming-related problem. Rather, it apparently just keeps stuffing recent pages into its memory for fast retrieval of frequently or recently visited sites. Eventually, it gets enough of these stored in RAM that it hurts its own performance.

I was unable to find any recommendations as to how big I ought to set that cache to avoid sluggish response while keeping maximum pages in RAM for quick retrieval. It is presently set at 50MB.

Next time my browser experience feels slow, I’ll try clearing cache rather than restarting the browser and see if I get a similar improvement. If you have any thoughts on this subject, please join my blog community and post a comment to this post or email me at dan at danshafer dot com.

I was chatting with a colleague yesterday as we were both examining a site we’re developing. I wss experiencing fairly frequent response lag while he was seeing only zippy performance. I thought I’d restart Firefox to see if that made any difference. Wow, did it!

Over the past few weeks, I’ve been noticing that Firefox does seem to get sluggish if I leave it on for a day or more. My colleague says he regularly quits and restarts FF 2-4 times each day. He’s on Windows while I, of course, run a Mac life. I did some research and conventional wisdom at least seems to be that FF does not have what is called a “memory leak”, a fairly serious programming-related problem. Rather, it apparently just keeps stuffing recent pages into its memory for fast retrieval of frequently or recently visited sites. Eventually, it gets enough of these stored in RAM that it hurts its own performance.

I was unable to find any recommendations as to how big I ought to set that cache to avoid sluggish response while keeping maximum pages in RAM for quick retrieval. It is presently set at 50MB.

Next time my browser experience feels slow, I’ll try clearing cache rather than restarting the browser and see if I get a similar improvement. If you have any thoughts on this subject, please join my blog community and post a comment to this post or email me at dan at danshafer dot com.

I was chatting with a colleague yesterday as we were both examining a site we’re developing. I wss experiencing fairly frequent response lag while he was seeing only zippy performance. I thought I’d restart Firefox to see if that made any difference. Wow, did it!

Over the past few weeks, I’ve been noticing that Firefox does seem to get sluggish if I leave it on for a day or more. My colleague says he regularly quits and restarts FF 2-4 times each day. He’s on Windows while I, of course, run a Mac life. I did some research and conventional wisdom at least seems to be that FF does not have what is called a “memory leak”, a fairly serious programming-related problem. Rather, it apparently just keeps stuffing recent pages into its memory for fast retrieval of frequently or recently visited sites. Eventually, it gets enough of these stored in RAM that it hurts its own performance.

I was unable to find any recommendations as to how big I ought to set that cache to avoid sluggish response while keeping maximum pages in RAM for quick retrieval. It is presently set at 50MB.

Next time my browser experience feels slow, I’ll try clearing cache rather than restarting the browser and see if I get a similar improvement. If you have any thoughts on this subject, please join my blog community and post a comment to this post or email me at dan at danshafer dot com.

I was chatting with a colleague yesterday as we were both examining a site we’re developing. I wss experiencing fairly frequent response lag while he was seeing only zippy performance. I thought I’d restart Firefox to see if that made any difference. Wow, did it!

Over the past few weeks, I’ve been noticing that Firefox does seem to get sluggish if I leave it on for a day or more. My colleague says he regularly quits and restarts FF 2-4 times each day. He’s on Windows while I, of course, run a Mac life. I did some research and conventional wisdom at least seems to be that FF does not have what is called a “memory leak”, a fairly serious programming-related problem. Rather, it apparently just keeps stuffing recent pages into its memory for fast retrieval of frequently or recently visited sites. Eventually, it gets enough of these stored in RAM that it hurts its own performance.

I was unable to find any recommendations as to how big I ought to set that cache to avoid sluggish response while keeping maximum pages in RAM for quick retrieval. It is presently set at 50MB.

Next time my browser experience feels slow, I’ll try clearing cache rather than restarting the browser and see if I get a similar improvement. If you have any thoughts on this subject, please join my blog community and post a comment to this post or email me at dan at danshafer dot com.

I was chatting with a colleague yesterday as we were both examining a site we’re developing. I wss experiencing fairly frequent response lag while he was seeing only zippy performance. I thought I’d restart Firefox to see if that made any difference. Wow, did it!

Over the past few weeks, I’ve been noticing that Firefox does seem to get sluggish if I leave it on for a day or more. My colleague says he regularly quits and restarts FF 2-4 times each day. He’s on Windows while I, of course, run a Mac life. I did some research and conventional wisdom at least seems to be that FF does not have what is called a “memory leak”, a fairly serious programming-related problem. Rather, it apparently just keeps stuffing recent pages into its memory for fast retrieval of frequently or recently visited sites. Eventually, it gets enough of these stored in RAM that it hurts its own performance.

I was unable to find any recommendations as to how big I ought to set that cache to avoid sluggish response while keeping maximum pages in RAM for quick retrieval. It is presently set at 50MB.

Next time my browser experience feels slow, I’ll try clearing cache rather than restarting the browser and see if I get a similar improvement. If you have any thoughts on this subject, please join my blog community and post a comment to this post or email me at dan at danshafer dot com.

I was chatting with a colleague yesterday as we were both examining a site we’re developing. I wss experiencing fairly frequent response lag while he was seeing only zippy performance. I thought I’d restart Firefox to see if that made any difference. Wow, did it!

Over the past few weeks, I’ve been noticing that Firefox does seem to get sluggish if I leave it on for a day or more. My colleague says he regularly quits and restarts FF 2-4 times each day. He’s on Windows while I, of course, run a Mac life. I did some research and conventional wisdom at least seems to be that FF does not have what is called a “memory leak”, a fairly serious programming-related problem. Rather, it apparently just keeps stuffing recent pages into its memory for fast retrieval of frequently or recently visited sites. Eventually, it gets enough of these stored in RAM that it hurts its own performance.

I was unable to find any recommendations as to how big I ought to set that cache to avoid sluggish response while keeping maximum pages in RAM for quick retrieval. It is presently set at 50MB.

Next time my browser experience feels slow, I’ll try clearing cache rather than restarting the browser and see if I get a similar improvement. If you have any thoughts on this subject, please join my blog community and post a comment to this post or email me at dan at danshafer dot com.

I was chatting with a colleague yesterday as we were both examining a site we’re developing. I wss experiencing fairly frequent response lag while he was seeing only zippy performance. I thought I’d restart Firefox to see if that made any difference. Wow, did it!

Over the past few weeks, I’ve been noticing that Firefox does seem to get sluggish if I leave it on for a day or more. My colleague says he regularly quits and restarts FF 2-4 times each day. He’s on Windows while I, of course, run a Mac life. I did some research and conventional wisdom at least seems to be that FF does not have what is called a “memory leak”, a fairly serious programming-related problem. Rather, it apparently just keeps stuffing recent pages into its memory for fast retrieval of frequently or recently visited sites. Eventually, it gets enough of these stored in RAM that it hurts its own performance.

I was unable to find any recommendations as to how big I ought to set that cache to avoid sluggish response while keeping maximum pages in RAM for quick retrieval. It is presently set at 50MB.

Next time my browser experience feels slow, I’ll try clearing cache rather than restarting the browser and see if I get a similar improvement. If you have any thoughts on this subject, please join my blog community and post a comment to this post or email me at dan at danshafer dot com.

Fingerz

Avatar: 22863 2010-11-15 01:15:51 -0500
16

[7 VIBRATING DOLDOES]

Level 35 Emo Kid

A neverhasbeen

Johnny Mac Posted:

Leaving Firefox running with iMacros and a billion flip-flops is p cool too.

YES!

Log in to see images!


Log in to see images!

Log in to see images!

Bandaney

Avatar: 70433 2014-06-07 22:10:47 -0400
24

[Grey Goose Mafiosi]

Level 60 Hacker

Ask me about how many male reproductive organs in my bum :zak:

Fingerz Posted:

ESPECIALLY

3:10PM

Nicco: http://www.xhaven.net/poetkurbs/Clouds.jpg

lol clouds.


Log in to see images!

Fingerz

Avatar: 22863 2010-11-15 01:15:51 -0500
16

[7 VIBRATING DOLDOES]

Level 35 Emo Kid

A neverhasbeen

*bump*


Log in to see images!

Log in to see images!

Internet Delay Chat
Have fun playing!
To chat with other players, you must Join Forumwarz or Log In now!