its been proven over the ages that men prefer a young woman, it always seems women date older guys usually. of course, you can take that one way or the other,

it varies all over the place, due to culture, like look at the ones that make em get married at 8 or something,

that puts it in perspective.

personally i think if you are into prepubescent girls or w/e youre p sick,

but once the girl is 18 or so and busting out all over then jumps on your face at some party,

like, hell…do that ****.

Nillo Posted:

disagree. A drawing of children being molested is still just that: a drawing. It’s not real and no children were harmed by drawing the image. Why should it be unacceptable?

If you tell me that the drawing could incite real acts of child molestation, consider that we depict all kinds of illegal stuff in movies, games and literature. If I run over pedestrians in Grand Theft Auto, does that give me an irresistible urge to kill people in real life? No. Every man is responsible for his own actions. The person who drew the image of children being molested did not do anything harmful and viewing the image does not automatically turn someone into a rapist.

John McCain thought it was Un-Acceptable. He appealed that the Child Photography law “PROTECT” be applied to drawings as well, and it was pbumed, so lolicon is illegal.

I personally have nothing against Lolicon, but I agree that pedophilic enjoy is bad. If it is a relationship and the younger person is not under 15 and the older person is not over 25, then I think it is ok.

Xylon Posted:

Pedophilia is not funny. It is not a joke. It is not something you should laugh at. Pedophiles molest and enjoy children. This is nearly all acts of pedophilia are illegal and depiction of children in sexual positions or of a sexual nature is illegal in most countries. There is no acceptable depiction of child sexuality. It is a perversion of our most basic humanity. Obsession with child actresses and anime chibis is pathetic to say the least

This is not a troll. This is a serious issue. At no point should Pedophilia, the advocation of, or the posting of pedophilia approving threads be allowed. This is part of the poison that is destroying this site.

while i understand your intentions are most likely noble- throwing out opinions framed as facts, subscribing to sweeping generalizations, and actively engaging in logical fallacy does little to support your view.

pedophiles do not enjoy and molest. rapists and molesters enjoy and molest. pedophilia is a mental illness and in no way implies that those who suffer from it act upon their impulses/urges.

depictions of underage sex and/or engaging in sex with a minor is perfectly acceptable in most “global south” countries and at best quasi-legal in many “global north” countries.

acceptable depictions of child sexuality have existed since the greco-roman empires and well through the renaissance.

i’ll not even broach the subject of what makes eighteen an acceptable age of consent as opposed to any other arbitrary age.

on to the bone of contention that i felt compelled to pick…

i would hope that any questionable material found in the role-playing forums of forumwarz would be seen as a distorted mirror image of the harsh reality of the internet. i doubt that anyone is advocating pedophilia- more likely anyone prosteletyzing such a belief is employing humor to revisit and rethink very serious issue in western culture. i would like to think that anyone posting illegal/illicit would be permabanned out of principle.

1338h4x Posted:

Pedophilia is a crime…

This is where most people fail at terminology. Pedophilia, in itself, is not a crime. It is the molestation of children that is a crime. I may or may not be a pedophile, but as long as I do not molest children, I am innocent.

Exactly.

Why would you own the pictures if you’re not going to act on them eventually?

Exactly.

It’s sick.

Micro-Ruckus Posted:

Exactly.

It’s sick.

No, I meant that masturbating does not a sex make. Personally, I masturbate to just about every female in my life, yet fully intend not to have real sex with any females anytime soon.

CloudieGin Posted:

I agree. Pedophilia is an illness. Though, it’s kinda sad how child molesters give innocent pedos (by innocent, I mean they’d never lay a finger on a kid) a bad name.

QFT, on both accounts.

I recognize the difference between pedophilia and sexual agression. However, with the stigma surrounding pedophilia in most cases by the time someone has admitted to the problem they have already acted on it, or have repressed the intent to on more than one occasion.

In my research, I found that there is a cycle for sexual abuse. The abuser is frustrated for some reason, they begin fantasizing about a target until they find one, then they groom the target, put themselves in situations where they can bumert power and control and then they usually go from there to the actual act of sexual abuse. Eventually it circles back to a frustration. There is nothing healthy about sexual depiction of children. Most so called harmless Loli shows young girls who are apprehensive to the abuse and then later they like it.

This could not be further from the truth. Young children who are abused may comply with the actions of their abuser but seldom do any admit to enjoying it. Loli reinforces the mindset of the abuser that their intentions, should they act on them will bring the child pleasure. When in truth, it will lead to severe emotional trauma and plenty of psycho-sexual baggage.

Lolicon is in and of itself harmless. It is how it is used by pedophiles that makes it so reprehensible.

Xylon edited this message on 01/18/2009 3:55PM

why hasnt that lovely dakota obvious pedo guy ever been banned?

i remember seeing a thread where he asked for pictures of small female children, but clothed

creepy as **** imo