the deck is rigged with a lot more 10s, J, Q, Ks

at least they could make all cards equally likely to appear…

The Wandering Hypocrite Posted:

I earn flezz with Blackjack. Sometime it is a better strategy to try to make the dealer bust.

You’re just lucky. It’s rigged.

Hobart Bliggity Posted:

I make at least 100k whenever I play blackjack

I don’t see anything too fishy about the card distro {would you say the frequency of 10JQK is way higher than 6789 or even 910JQ?)and while it seems that the bot gets the breaks all the time, thats the nature of gambling.

Furthermore, following some strategy that doesn’t even apply to this blackjack (single deck, reshuffle after each hand, no peek on dealer ace) is not the best way to try to win, ESPECIALLY if you truly believe the deck is rigged.

Sure gambling is rigged, but not that rigged.

Gamblebot getting 21’s with 7 cards, busting by hitting on 12, losing more than half of the double down’s, etc.

UnlimitedANC Posted:

ITT, people who suck at blackjack.

No. Even with the best strat guide.

it’s pretty fair, just one thing imo: When gamble-bot has 11, you can be sure he gets a card worth 10 in more than 90% of the cases.

Here I thought that the rigging was to charge people for Antifreeze scoops, and now I know it’s just to **** people off. I’m ambivalent about the whole process, it’s not like I can’t just go and get another couple hundred thousand flezz with a few day’s worth of visits. I mean, come on. It’s just flezz.

other than the fact that splitting pairs isn’t allowed

that the natural blackjack is +50% not +20%

and that the dealer has >= 20 about 99% of the time

the game is almost equal

i usually have a net gain of flezz at the end

It’s seemed really rigged today the dealer got 21 about 8 times in a row without ever getting a black jack.

generichaxor Posted:

i played GB 1000s of rounds and added the results into an excel spreadsheet

over 99% of the time, GB had some form of 20 or higher

Maybe you are right, I never ran any numbers on it and I might have not been taking busts into consideration. But I do think that the statistic is misleading because if the player played like the dealer I believe it would have the same percentage.

generichaxor Posted:

if player and comp switched roles,

are we still going with the same rules?

no splitting, 20% instead of 50% for natural, dealer doesn’t win on ties, rigged deck, etc…?

Splitting and blackjack payout doesn’t really matter for this argument.

But tell me how is the deck rigged?