You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.
You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.
markchild's Flamebate Posts
View markchild's Profile- « previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next »
Search Results | ||
---|---|---|
CLOSED: THE SECRET OF MYSPACE TOM REVEALED - A TSB RIDDLE. CURRENT PRIZE FUND – 25BPGod I’ve been gone a long time I’m on it. (view post) |
07/15/2008 | |
Wii, PSP or DS?I’ve had my Wii collecting dust for about a year. I really should finish Zelda. (view post) |
05/27/2008 | |
Last post wins 3 BPI’ll post. (view post) |
05/27/2008 | |
GENERIC STUPID TOPIC IN HOPE OF RAISING FLAMEBAIT SCOREmarkchd Posted:
QFT (view post) |
05/01/2008 | |
The Thread for New People to Introduce Themselves6 (view post) |
04/28/2008 | |
Let's make this thread count!210 (view post) |
04/17/2008 | |
The Official Forumwarz Episode 1 FAQn00b65 Posted:
Even a single deck composition dependent strategy card? Sure, no splits, but better than nothing … maybe. (view post) |
04/11/2008 | |
Can someone give me a challenge here?JThizz Posted:
There are 25 forums now. Or is it 26? (view post) |
04/09/2008 | |
bumhole card - has it been changed?You are playing a 1-deck strategy, right?
‘cause house edge in this game is crazy small. (view post) |
04/07/2008 | |
I cannot WAIT for the 40 forum e-peen!Dang, shoulda looked at ‘em rather than trusting Zi.
Why Ziii, WHY? (view post) |
04/07/2008 | |
I cannot WAIT for the 40 forum e-peen!Zi Posted:
wait, 4+8=12. 8+12≠16. 12+16≠24. You’ve got some ‘splaining to do.
4+8=12, 12+4=16, 16+8 is 24. maybe 24+12=36 next? No real pattern though. (view post) |
04/07/2008 | |
Girllss... post yer mammary glands!!BlueJaybird Posted: |
04/06/2008 | |
Farming cowsevilhamster Posted:FTW (view post) |
04/06/2008 | |
Farming cowsKomodo Dragons are edible as is. Who cares about endangered status?
Movie reference? Sorta. (view post) |
04/06/2008 | |
Haggis, we can continue our discussion of C.S. Lewis, atheism, and religion in here.I will read the entire work before going at it again. Also, one firm critique of faith is that it allows abrogation of real world responsibilities. Just something to chew on until I read up. (view post) |
04/04/2008 | |
please square do something with the final fantasy viii universeMuddyBallzFlap Posted:
I plugged in the game shark after 8 hours in the castle. I was ashamed.
Replayed and did more level grinding, it was easy then. (view post) |
04/04/2008 | |
Haggis, we can continue our discussion of C.S. Lewis, atheism, and religion in here.
“I conclude then, that though the difference between people’s ideas of Decent Behaviour often make you suspect that there is no real natural Law of Behaviour at all, yet the things we are bound to think about these differences really prove just the opposite. But one word before I end. I have met people who exaggerate the differences, because they have not distinguished between difference of morality and differences of belief about facts. For example, one man said to me, ‘Three hundred years ago people in England were putting witches to death. Was that what you call the Rule of Human Nature or Right Conduct?’ But surely the reason we do not execute witches is that we do not believe there are such things. If we did — if we really thought that there were people going about who had sold themselves to the devil and received supernatural powers from him in return and were using these powers to kill their neighbors or drive them mad or bring bad weather — surely we would all agree that if anyone deserved the death penalty, then these filthy quislings did? There is no difference of moral principle here: the difference is simple about matter of fact. It may be a great advance in knowledge not to believe in witches: there is no moral advance in not executing them when you do not think they are there. You would not call a man humane for ceasing to set mousetraps if he did so because he believes there were no mice in the house.”
All well and good but, how do you, or C.S. counter the real argument?
Societies develop moral codes to benefit society. It logically follows that members of those societies will be indoctrinated with ideals that sustain those societies. Most societies will, therefore, encourage helping others. This accounts for similar moral codes around the globe without invoking religion.
HaggisBasher Posted: Clbum of ‘03? Cool. We’ll talk about the standards for theories in a bit. Theories aren’t facts, but they are closer than you may think.
End argument part 1.
I, in fact respect your viewpoint, and am a Christian. Think of this as a debate with name calling. I just believe that my faith has to fly in the face of proven science and yell “but I’m the exception.” (view post) |
04/04/2008 | |
Haggis, we can continue our discussion of C.S. Lewis, atheism, and religion in here.HaggisBasher Posted:
Before I begin. From:http://essayinfo.com/essays/persuasive_essay.phpDisprove the opposing argument. Understand the opposite viewpoint of your position and then counter it by providing contrasting evidence or by finding mistakes and inconsistencies in the logic of the opposing argument.
So no free points to C.S. for the counter-argument.
“But you will find inside you, in addition to these two impulses, a third thing which tells you that you ought to follow the impulse to help, and suppress the impulse to run away.”
A good argument against it being instinctive, but it leads directly to the question of moral law as a societal phenomenon.
“If two instincts are in conflict, and there is nothing in a creature’s mind except those two instincts, obviously the stronger of the two must win.”
One of many bumumption that are stated in this paragraph without support.
“Here is a third way of seeing it. If the Moral Law was one of our instincts, we ought to be able to point to some one impulse inside us which was always what we call ‘good,’ always in agreement with the rule of right behaviors. But you cannot.”
Here I agree with the statement. Moral Law is not instinctive.
“The people who ask that question are usually taking it for granted that if we have learned a thing from parents and teachers, then that thing must be merely a human invention. But, of course, that is not so. ... But the standard that measures two things is something different from either. You are, in fact, comparing them both with some Real Morality…”
Flat wrong, you are measuring it against your ideal of morality. Do you think Hitler thought his moral law was immoral. No, he was witch hunting. (see below) (view post) |
04/04/2008 | |
please square do something with the final fantasy viii universeSkyreal Posted:
It’s in the right forum. It just happens to pop up in the top 5. I wish **** from the Trollhole didn’t. (view post) |
04/04/2008 | |
Haggis, we can continue our discussion of C.S. Lewis, atheism, and religion in here.We started in IDC, but ****ed too many folks off. (view post) |
04/04/2008 |
- « previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next »