**Forumwarz**is the first "Massively Single-Player" online RPG completely built around Internet culture.

You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.

You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.

# a dallop a daisy's Flamebate Posts

View a dallop a daisy's ProfileSearch Results | ||
---|---|---|

## **** the internet!I do agree with all of you that all of these pedophiles are disturbing; however, I am slightly disturbed that all of you are saying all of these bad things about lolicon. Yes, it is true that lolicon serves the interest of pedophiles (agreed, pedophiles get off on it – what can we say?), but it is also true that it is not so much about “getting off” on it as it is about the very idea that it is disturbing. For example, many lolicon pictures disturb me to no end – and some people like disturbing things. Is it not the reason why people read Stephen King, or watch horror movies? There is tons of guro – and I suppose people look at guro for the same reason as they watch lolicon, which is that they like watching things that disturb themselves. Finally, doesn’t the Bible contain pbumages where child abuse happens? I do not think that looking at lolicon is any endorsement of child abuse – it is merely a stimulus to the imagination of horrors, just like reading any book or looking at any picture is a stimulus to the imagination of what they depict.
Moreover, it still has the potential for artistic value. For example, what do you think of an image depicting Romeo and Juliet having sex? This could be clbumified as lolicon, but it would be meaningful in a way. It is quite unfortunate that pedophiles like the one you have quoted would enjoy looking at such images, but then, it also has some legitimate uses such as the artistic value. It is certainly not true that the agreement one pedophile or other kind of bad person poisons the whole. That’s like saying that everyone who believes that Berlin is in Germany is a Nazi because Hitler believed the same.
After all, it really doesn’t make sense that looking at pictures of child abuse makes yourself a child abuse. That’s like saying looking at pictures of Harry Potter makes you a wizard. The most important thing is that it is merely a drawing, a mere arrangement of inkblots that has not harmed anyone in its production. The reason why real child pornography is banned is because it encourages production – which invariably harms minors. As I have already mentioned, the Bible contains pbumages of child abuse, people are free to draw pictures of murder. The purposes of these images is to depict and show things about bad things that happen. Similarly, pictures of child abuse is essentially to show things about the bad thing known as child sexual abuse.
For example, if someone were to illustrate one of the horror stories of one of those “copypasta” /b/tards, it would be considered lolicon, right? And yet it would also be instructive and informative, for illustrations would show clearly the horror story that has occurred, as well as making it all the horror story more vivid.
Really, how many people go to 4chan? This is about 20000 people, and I suspect that these pedophiles are more notable among them because they are pedophiles, whilst most people are just ordinary people.
(I admit, the quality of 4chan has been declining ever since its origin. I myself am disgusted with 4chan people. I mean, I swear, most of these 4chan people are high-school drop-outs who are on drugs. ON DRUGS. I have seen plenty of drug discussion threads. And plenty of people just doing stupid stuff. I was once a frequenter of the Yuri board /u/, where there were lively discussions about relationships, the meaningfulness and artistic quality of the yuri pictures, as well as discussions about how people personally relate to yuri series like Marimite, Strawberry Panic, Kannazuki no Miko, and so on. Now, however, it has become much more unpleasant, as more and more people have begun to arrive to say “we need more yuri porn” and “stop it with the stupid discussions.” This is quite indicative of the decline of 4chan. I will never go back to 4chan. As a side note, I am going to keep my own anonymous message boards at 28chan.)
The following article is also instructive on the current mentality of 4chan: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/03/magazine/03trolls-t.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&hp
Also, here are two pictures relating to the first of the two stories: http://bayimg.com/image/daknnaabb.jpg http://bayimg.com/image/daknpaabb.jpg
What can we learn from this? 4chan turns people into retards. (view post) |
08/06/2008 | |

## Help with math plz
it means the sequence of sets A_n is increasing and each A_n is in the ring R and the union of it is A. (view post) |
03/08/2008 | |

## hlp with another math problem plzWe have to prove that there exists a solution of (20.1) or of (20.1’ ) satisfying given initial conditions, say |
03/08/2008 | |

## hlp with another math problem plzhlp from my diff. geo. book i dun get it:
Let κ(s) (>0) and τ(s) be continuous functions of a real variable s, defined in an interval |
03/08/2008 | |

## Help with math plz
o its very simple
it means “for all rings R, for all A within M(R ), there exists a sequence of sets A_n which are elements of R such that their union is A.”
to see wat im talking about, here is an example in which it is implicitly stated: http://www-maths.swan.ac.uk/staff/vl/c98.pdf go to page 18, theorem 4.2
Theorem 4.2 Let A be an algebra of sets, μ and ν two measures defined on the σ-algebra A_σ generated by A. Then μ ↾ A = ν ↾ A implies μ = ν.
μ(S) = lim (n⇒∞) μ(S_n) = lim (n⇒∞) ν(S_n) = ν(S). (view post) |
03/07/2008 | |

## Help with math plzacutually i made a mistake plz forgiv me the actual statement i dun understand is (corections are bolded): ∀R R is a ring thar i think i wroat it in proper formal language plz tell me why this is true (view post) |
03/07/2008 | |

## Help with math plzPlz hlp I hav a problem in math i dun understand plz hlp me here
let M(S) denote the monotone clbum generated by a set of sets S i dun understand why ∀S S is a ring ∀A x∈M(S) ∃{A_n} (A_n⊂A_(n+1)∧S_n∈S∧(∪(S_n)=S) plz explain this to me i dun understand why this is true, its a fact used for proving the uniqueness of extention of measure (view post) |
03/07/2008 | |

## T. S. EliotWhat is your opinion of T. S. Eliot? I take a keen interest in “The Waste Land,” and I feel like learning Latin just so that I could read the Satyricon which was quoted “NAM Sibyllam quidem great timesis ego ipse oculis meis vidi in ampulla pendere, et great times illi pueri dicerunt: Sebulla pe theleis; respondebat illa: apothanein thelo.”
The same goes for “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock.” (view post) |
03/05/2008 |