Only public flamebate results are returned.
Search Results |
|
Arktor Posted:
How about BAN SG-ENABLING MOCK-94
How about you shut up?
(view post)
|
07/26/2008 |
|
How about BAN SG-ENABLING MOCK-94
(view post)
|
07/26/2008 |
|
SG94 Posted:
when I’m a girlLog in to see images!
Don’t perpetuate that chauvinistic crap! You’re no girl! You’re a woman! You’re every bit as good as a man and you won’t let a patriarchal society hold you back!
(view post)
|
07/26/2008 |
|
meeeeeeeeee Posted:
Or to put it another way, it’s all very well fixing the special case, but the danger then is of neglecting the game as a whole, and it’s all alot of effort going around in circles, waiting for more players to start actively participating (which if they were there in the first place, might have meant the game doesn’t require so much fixing after all)
I concur.
(view post)
|
07/26/2008 |
|
Earlier today, STR had its weekly raid against Great Firewall of China. We downed Illustrious_Moderator, Most Happy Good Fortune Fish, “Jet” Li, Capitalist Pig, One of You Must Go, Chairman Meow, Rofl Mao, The Art of Flame War, Censor Ship, and finally the Illustrious Minister of Service Interruption. We were thrilled when he dropped his Legendary Headset (Left Piece). Tarman actually screamed in Vent, he was so excited!
So then this fabulous person ninjas it. I’ve booted him out of the klan, and I hope the raiding community will be aware that this bastard is no good.
(view post)
|
07/26/2008 |
|
meeeeeeeeee Posted:
If there were more players, actively raiding in more klans, competing in the same brackets, with an evenly matched number of players, would the same hold true? We’re in a bit of a special case scenario at the moment. Yes it needs to be fixed, but the fix may be more along the lines of encouraging more raiding, than a technical fix. Or at least, both equally.
1. Yes
2. No
(view post)
|
07/26/2008 |
|
o
(view post)
|
07/26/2008 |
|
grats!
(view post)
|
07/26/2008 |
|
xXxJUNEGUY1xXx Posted:
OH YEAH HOW ABOUT THIS:
Log in to see images!
David’s nudity facing Goliath is explained as a result of verses 1 Samuel 17:38-39. Saul supplied David with a warrior’s dress and David wore it. However he could not walk with it and therefore took it off. It is most likely that David wore the warrior’s clothes instead of his own shepherd’s clothes and not on his clothes. Therefore, it could be bumumed that after David took off the warrior’s clothes he remained nude. This symbolizes the innate belief that man, by shedding itself of woman, could achieve greater things.
(view post)
|
07/26/2008 |
|
yes sometimes because I feel that art depicts women as objects, rather than as thinking, feeling humans
(view post)
|
07/26/2008 |
|
fiiine dont answer me jerk~!
(view post)
|
07/26/2008 |
|
what’s this from? tell me plz
(view post)
|
07/26/2008 |
|
what is this from?
(view post)
|
07/26/2008 |
|
cool beans
(view post)
|
07/26/2008 |
|
Pluvius Posted:
It’s not the lack of communication that’s important in this case, it’s the deceit and the issue of payout.
Say that you have a bracket with only four characters which are owned by four different players, and the characters are all in the same Klan. Since there are four characters, at least one of them is not going to get any medals.
Let’s say first of all that despite the fact that they’re technically helping their competitors in addition to themselves, the four go ahead and raid together as usual. They all get hundreds of scoops, and they’re all still competitive with each other at the end of the week. The big expected battle for scoops breaks out and the winners get the spoils, as usual.
Now let’s say that they all agree not to raid. They don’t get as many scoops, but they still compete with each other based on other scoop-grabbing methods, and have the same battle at the end of the week. The situation is fundamentally the same whether or not they raid; despite the fact that some players are better at solo play than raiding and vice versa, it makes essentially no difference in the general case.
Now let’s say that something far more likely happens—they all agree not to raid but one player breaks the agreement. He gets hundreds of scoops and easily wins the round, and the other players don’t get ****. He might get kicked out of the Klan, but so what? There are other Klans out there, some of which don’t know what he did and others that surely realize (possibly through hard experience) that agreements not to raid are a fool’s bargain.
In conclusion, collusion only works when the benefits of colluding are greater than the benefits of not colluding, and the penalties for breaking collusion are sufficiently great to discourage it. In this case of colluding against raiding, neither of these things is true. In fact, in a real Domination bracket agreeing not to raid would actually be worse because the other people in the bracket could more easily beat the people who aren’t raiding.
Completely agreed. It’s a simple matter of Nash equilibrium. All of the raiders benefit from their cooperation with each other, which puts them ahead of their competition. Instead of competing with 8 people, they’re competing with 4.
(view post)
|
07/26/2008 |
|
http://cellmates.us/
Just thought you’d like to know.
(view post)
|
07/26/2008 |
|
MC Banhammer Posted:
How about remembering we’re in Game Discussion? Warnings handed out to the above two posters. And when I get a chance I’ll look for previous warnings, and so bans may be handed out.
Wait, what did I do this time?
(view post)
|
07/26/2008 |
|
SG94 Posted:
I wouldn’t make illegal multis. Sure, you can get medals and Forumbuildr E-Peen for yourself and your friends, but you’d risk a tempban… tough choice.
Hm… useless medals and e-peen, versus being banned for a few days. A few days without forumwarz would drive me insane.
(view post)
|
07/26/2008 |
|
brb making illegal alts to vote enjoy up
also sotqr is ahead of kpc
(view post)
|
07/26/2008 |
|
Morro the bumless Posted:
no theres more, but you have your mouth wrapped around thick man meat too much to notice.
Better than having your mouth wrapped around thin man meat Log in to see images!
(view post)
|
07/26/2008 |