You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.
You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.
Arktor's Flamebate Posts
View Arktor's ProfileSearch Results | ||
---|---|---|
Arktor is hacking DominationGinny Weasley Posted:
P.S. UR A DUMB **** WHO SNOGS EVERY MAN SHE SEES (view post) |
07/28/2008 | |
Arktor is hacking DominationITS OK I REPORTED IT TO CZ SO NOW IM ALLOWED TO EXPLOIT IT JUST LIKE EPISODE 2 BETA (view post) |
07/28/2008 | |
My new titleFran Posted:
Am I the only one who reads the forums? Don’t answer that. I don’t want to know if I am. Besides, logos, styles, forum entries are a dead giveaway. (view post) |
07/27/2008 | |
My new titleFran Posted:
I didn’t even submit entries. And I’m sure because -dun dun dun dun- You can see who submitted what # of winning entries! (view post) |
07/27/2008 | |
My new titlemeeeeeeeeee Posted:
You have no evidence for your claims. The facts suggest that it is highly likely that you did – although it is possible that everyone who voted in forumbuildr was just inclined to vote highly on ****ty ep 2 beta entries. (view post) |
07/27/2008 | |
My new titlemeeeeeeeeee Posted:
YES, IT IS PURE COINCIDENCE (view post) |
07/27/2008 | |
My new titlecoreyjess Posted:
Which members haven’t? (view post) |
07/27/2008 | |
My new titlemeeeeeeeeee Posted:
Well, let’s look at the facts.
-if all three accounts voted on the same forumbuildr entries, they could not possibly have belonged to one of the accounts, since you can’t vote on your own submission. -the dates in question correspond to the dates when PD mysteriously won all of the forumbuildr entries one week after another (with, might I add, ****-poor submissions.) -Members of Episode 2 Beta have admitted to using unklanned alts to vote on klan member’s submissions. (view post) |
07/27/2008 | |
My new titlemeeeeeeeeee Posted:
I proved that members of episode 2 beta were using illegal alts to vote for other members. Sounds like “multiple” to me.
If I were “waiting for an opportunity” I would have already posted it >_> (view post) |
07/27/2008 | |
Domination Forum Listzigzagoon Posted: |
07/27/2008 | |
TBC CELEBRATES THEIR LATEST MEDALS EARNED ON AN EPIC 14 HOUR RAIDholy ****… this post is amazing. (view post) |
07/27/2008 | |
My new titlemeeeeeeeeee Posted:
Hi there,
So there’s been some discussion on the forums as to whether or not it was fair to ban you for illegal multis.
Obviously I don’t like to ban anyone who has been as generous to us as you have been, but we were pretty
sure we had a good case. But since you were so nice to us, I figured I’d present the evidence we have to
you and give you the ability to respond to it with your side of the story.
We have three accounts that play from your IP address:
(email address removed)
The account name on your biggest account is (name removed), which sure seems to match the person using
the email addresses of the other two accounts.
Now the (email address removed) account was created a couple of days after the (main) account,
but it has logged in as recently as the 16th of July. The (email address removed) account was created on the 19th of June,
well after the (main) account had been active for quite some time.
Normally we’d let old illegal multi accounts slide, but both of these have been flagged in our system as
“active”, due primarily to voting in forumbuildr.
In fact, this month all three accounts have voted in forumbuildr, including on the same items!
So this is the evidence we have to present that you were using illegal multis (despite having enough
BP to purchase those two extra accounts and have many left over), and that you were using them
to vote on things in forumbuildr quite recently.
Do you think our ruling is unfair? I haven’t heard from you but I gather you have been talking to other
members about it.
Honestly it really does pain me to ban someone who has given us as much money as you have,
but if not people would be saying “Hey, Forumwarz lets you buy forumbuildr votes if you’re
generous to them” you know? We have to be consistent.
-ET
Hi there,
So there’s been some discussion on the forums as to whether or not it was fair to ban you for illegal multis.
Obviously I don’t like to ban anyone who has been as generous to us as you have been, but we were pretty
sure we had a good case. But since you were so nice to us, I figured I’d present the evidence we have to
you and give you the ability to respond to it with your side of the story.
We have three accounts that play from your IP address:
(email address removed)
The account name on your biggest account is (name removed), which sure seems to match the person using
the email addresses of the other two accounts.
Now the (email address removed) account was created a couple of days after the (main) account,
but it has logged in as recently as the 16th of July. The (email address removed) account was created on the 19th of June,
well after the (main) account had been active for quite some time.
Normally we’d let old illegal multi accounts slide, but both of these have been flagged in our system as
“active”, due primarily to voting in forumbuildr.
In fact, this month all three accounts have voted in forumbuildr, including on the same items!
So this is the evidence we have to present that you were using illegal multis (despite having enough
BP to purchase those two extra accounts and have many left over), and that you were using them
to vote on things in forumbuildr quite recently.
Do you think our ruling is unfair? I haven’t heard from you but I gather you have been talking to other
members about it.
Honestly it really does pain me to ban someone who has given us as much money as you have,
but if not people would be saying “Hey, Forumwarz lets you buy forumbuildr votes if you’re
generous to them” you know? We have to be consistent.
-ET
Hi there,
So there’s been some discussion on the forums as to whether or not it was fair to ban you for illegal multis.
Obviously I don’t like to ban anyone who has been as generous to us as you have been, but we were pretty
sure we had a good case. But since you were so nice to us, I figured I’d present the evidence we have to
you and give you the ability to respond to it with your side of the story.
We have three accounts that play from your IP address:
(email address removed)
The account name on your biggest account is (name removed), which sure seems to match the person using
the email addresses of the other two accounts.
Now the (email address removed) account was created a couple of days after the (main) account,
but it has logged in as recently as the 16th of July. The (email address removed) account was created on the 19th of June,
well after the (main) account had been active for quite some time.
Normally we’d let old illegal multi accounts slide, but both of these have been flagged in our system as
“active”, due primarily to voting in forumbuildr.
In fact, this month all three accounts have voted in forumbuildr, including on the same items!
So this is the evidence we have to present that you were using illegal multis (despite having enough
BP to purchase those two extra accounts and have many left over), and that you were using them
to vote on things in forumbuildr quite recently.
Do you think our ruling is unfair? I haven’t heard from you but I gather you have been talking to other
members about it.
Honestly it really does pain me to ban someone who has given us as much money as you have,
but if not people would be saying “Hey, Forumwarz lets you buy forumbuildr votes if you’re
generous to them” you know? We have to be consistent.
-ET
Hi there,
So there’s been some discussion on the forums as to whether or not it was fair to ban you for illegal multis.
Obviously I don’t like to ban anyone who has been as generous to us as you have been, but we were pretty
sure we had a good case. But since you were so nice to us, I figured I’d present the evidence we have to
you and give you the ability to respond to it with your side of the story.
We have three accounts that play from your IP address:
(email address removed)
The account name on your biggest account is (name removed), which sure seems to match the person using
the email addresses of the other two accounts.
Now the (email address removed) account was created a couple of days after the (main) account,
but it has logged in as recently as the 16th of July. The (email address removed) account was created on the 19th of June,
well after the (main) account had been active for quite some time.
Normally we’d let old illegal multi accounts slide, but both of these have been flagged in our system as
“active”, due primarily to voting in forumbuildr.
In fact, this month all three accounts have voted in forumbuildr, including on the same items!
So this is the evidence we have to present that you were using illegal multis (despite having enough
BP to purchase those two extra accounts and have many left over), and that you were using them
to vote on things in forumbuildr quite recently.
Do you think our ruling is unfair? I haven’t heard from you but I gather you have been talking to other
members about it.
Honestly it really does pain me to ban someone who has given us as much money as you have,
but if not people would be saying “Hey, Forumwarz lets you buy forumbuildr votes if you’re
generous to them” you know? We have to be consistent.
-ET
Hi there,
So there’s been some discussion on the forums as to whether or not it was fair to ban you for illegal multis.
Obviously I don’t like to ban anyone who has been as generous to us as you have been, but we were pretty
sure we had a good case. But since you were so nice to us, I figured I’d present the evidence we have to
you and give you the ability to respond to it with your side of the story.
We have three accounts that play from your IP address:
(email address removed)
The account name on your biggest account is (name removed), which sure seems to match the person using
the email addresses of the other two accounts.
Now the (email address removed) account was created a couple of days after the (main) account,
but it has logged in as recently as the 16th of July. The (email address removed) account was created on the 19th of June,
well after the (main) account had been active for quite some time.
Normally we’d let old illegal multi accounts slide, but both of these have been flagged in our system as
“active”, due primarily to voting in forumbuildr.
In fact, this month all three accounts have voted in forumbuildr, including on the same items!
So this is the evidence we have to present that you were using illegal multis (despite having enough
BP to purchase those two extra accounts and have many left over), and that you were using them
to vote on things in forumbuildr quite recently.
Do you think our ruling is unfair? I haven’t heard from you but I gather you have been talking to other
members about it.
Honestly it really does pain me to ban someone who has given us as much money as you have,
but if not people would be saying “Hey, Forumwarz lets you buy forumbuildr votes if you’re
generous to them” you know? We have to be consistent.
-ET (view post) |
07/27/2008 | |
My new titlecoreyjess Posted:
Then that’s your problem. When you refuse to see the humor, the rapists win. When you can laugh at them, they have no power over you. (view post) |
07/27/2008 | |
Pandemic 2 in one .gif imagePickled male reproductive organbum Posted:
BIG hax. Hax like spending evolution points! (view post) |
07/27/2008 | |
My new titlealcolol Posted:
...Contrinuting? (view post) |
07/27/2008 | |
Spoilers in ForumbuildrOrb Posted:
What about after they get the final mission? (view post) |
07/27/2008 | |
Spoilers in ForumbuildrSG94 Posted: Copy-pasted from HSB: This week’s “An Hero”: The deluxe interrupter who broke the Coral Springs Nuclear Generating Station Might just be me but I didn’t expect it to, you know, explode (view post) |
07/27/2008 | |
Spoilers in ForumbuildrApparently no one else has any thoughts on this. (view post) |
07/27/2008 | |
Noob questions: what's the tiny male reproductive organ and how do you sell items?URMOMLAWL Posted: The link isn’t activated in your bookmarks until you read a certain tubmail from grave re-digger or some such. (view post) |
07/27/2008 | |
Ban ****ty Guy 94!!1337xxxlolololxxx1337 Posted:
BAR ANKTOR (view post) |
07/26/2008 |